Narrative:

An airbus questioned ground control/flight data on the spokane two departure. The aircraft wanted to know what the 4;000 was for; and if he needed to level off at 4;000 or continue climbing. This happens a lot. I have recently questioned the wording and significance of 4;000 on the spokane two departure. The spokane two departure [needs to] be notamed immediately clarifying that 4;000 is extraneous information; and the pilot should disregard it and continue to climb to FL120. Secondly; recommend changing the spokane two departure in the next publication as soon as possible to read more clearly and get rid of 4;000; as this procedure has been out for over a year.

Google
 

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: GEG Controller voiced concern regarding the published 4;000 altitude restriction on the Spokane Two Departure; noting ATC is expecting aircraft to climb to 12;000; the reporter recommending modifications to the SID chart.

Narrative: An Airbus questioned Ground Control/Flight Data on the Spokane Two Departure. The aircraft wanted to know what the 4;000 was for; and if he needed to level off at 4;000 or continue climbing. This happens a lot. I have recently questioned the wording and significance of 4;000 on the Spokane Two Departure. The Spokane Two Departure [needs to] be NOTAMed immediately clarifying that 4;000 is extraneous information; and the pilot should disregard it and continue to climb to FL120. Secondly; recommend changing the Spokane Two Departure in the next publication ASAP to read more clearly and get rid of 4;000; as this procedure has been out for over a year.

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2013 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.