37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 103155 |
Time | |
Date | 198901 |
Day | Thu |
Local Time Of Day | 1201 To 1800 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | airport : slc |
State Reference | UT |
Altitude | agl bound lower : 0 agl bound upper : 0 |
Environment | |
Flight Conditions | VMC |
Light | Daylight |
Aircraft 1 | |
Operator | common carrier : air carrier |
Make Model Name | Large Transport, Low Wing, 2 Turbojet Eng |
Navigation In Use | Other |
Flight Phase | climbout : takeoff |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Person 1 | |
Affiliation | company : air carrier |
Function | flight crew : captain oversight : pic |
Qualification | pilot : cfi pilot : flight engineer pilot : atp |
Experience | flight time last 90 days : 100 flight time total : 20000 flight time type : 100 |
ASRS Report | 103155 |
Person 2 | |
Affiliation | company : air carrier |
Function | observation : company check pilot |
Qualification | pilot : atp |
Experience | flight time last 90 days : 250 flight time total : 25000 flight time type : 2500 |
ASRS Report | 103077 |
Events | |
Anomaly | aircraft equipment problem : critical other anomaly other |
Independent Detector | other flight crewa |
Resolutory Action | flight crew : overcame equipment problem flight crew : rejected takeoff |
Consequence | Other |
Supplementary | |
Primary Problem | Aircraft |
Air Traffic Incident | other |
Narrative:
Aircraft was in position for takeoff. When power was added we heard a flap warning. A quick check revealed the flaps were set properly and indicated the proper position but the warning persisted and we taxied off the runway. Investigation revealed that the takeoff flap cg computer was slightly out of position which caused the warning. The computer was reset and no further warnings were experienced. The problem may have been noticed earlier but one of the pilots was a check airman giving another pilot (captain) a line qualification into jackson hole so the takeoff briefing was quite extensive. Also, the numbers on the flap computer were worn and dusty and not too legible. The captain getting the qualification had just over 100 hours in aircraft. So inexperience a factor.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: FLAP WARNING, ABORT TKOF.
Narrative: ACFT WAS IN POS FOR TKOF. WHEN PWR WAS ADDED WE HEARD A FLAP WARNING. A QUICK CHK REVEALED THE FLAPS WERE SET PROPERLY AND INDICATED THE PROPER POS BUT THE WARNING PERSISTED AND WE TAXIED OFF THE RWY. INVESTIGATION REVEALED THAT THE TKOF FLAP CG COMPUTER WAS SLIGHTLY OUT OF POS WHICH CAUSED THE WARNING. THE COMPUTER WAS RESET AND NO FURTHER WARNINGS WERE EXPERIENCED. THE PROB MAY HAVE BEEN NOTICED EARLIER BUT ONE OF THE PLTS WAS A CHK AIRMAN GIVING ANOTHER PLT (CAPT) A LINE QUALIFICATION INTO JACKSON HOLE SO THE TKOF BRIEFING WAS QUITE EXTENSIVE. ALSO, THE NUMBERS ON THE FLAP COMPUTER WERE WORN AND DUSTY AND NOT TOO LEGIBLE. THE CAPT GETTING THE QUALIFICATION HAD JUST OVER 100 HRS IN ACFT. SO INEXPERIENCE A FACTOR.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of August 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.