37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 1038874 |
Time | |
Date | 201209 |
Local Time Of Day | 0601-1200 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | VABF.ARTCC |
State Reference | FO |
Environment | |
Flight Conditions | Mixed |
Light | Daylight |
Aircraft 1 | |
Make Model Name | Global 5000 (Bombardier) |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 91 |
Flight Phase | Initial Approach |
Route In Use | Vectors |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Person 1 | |
Function | First Officer Pilot Not Flying |
Qualification | Flight Crew Air Transport Pilot (ATP) Flight Crew Flight Instructor Flight Crew Instrument Flight Crew Multiengine |
Experience | Flight Crew Last 90 Days 70 Flight Crew Total 17610 Flight Crew Type 480 |
Events | |
Anomaly | Deviation - Altitude Excursion From Assigned Altitude Deviation - Procedural Clearance Inflight Event / Encounter CFTT / CFIT |
Miss Distance | Vertical 500 |
Narrative:
While being vectored for a VOR approach at pune; india we were on a right downwind for runway 28 and on an assigned heading of 103 degrees. We were given a descent to which I understood to be 2;800 ft and read back 2;800 ft. When reaching 2;800 ft we got an egpws warning 'to low gear.' when initially hearing 2;800 ft; I thought it was low because on the DME arc it states 3;800 ft. The pilot flying and our third pilot in the jump seat heard me read back 2;800 ft and didn't question my response. Shortly after receiving the egpws warning approach control told us we were at 2;700 ft and that we were cleared to 3;800 ft and to climb back up to 3;800 ft. I mentioned to approach I had understood and read back 2;800 ft and we were climbing to 3;800 ft. This all happened rather quickly; fortunately the weather was scattered clouds and visibility was good along with the controller catching the mistake. I feel the language barrier added to this error. I let the controller lead me into a false sense of security when he gave us a vector of 103 degrees thinking this military controller is very precise; normally vectors are given in 5 degree increments. Next time I will follow my gut and question the controller.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: Global 5000 First Officer accepts a clearance to descend to 2;800 FT during approach to VAPO. This triggers a GPWS warning and a call from ATC to climb up to 3;800 FT.
Narrative: While being vectored for a VOR approach at Pune; India we were on a right downwind for Runway 28 and on an assigned heading of 103 degrees. We were given a descent to which I understood to be 2;800 FT and read back 2;800 FT. When reaching 2;800 FT we got an EGPWS warning 'To Low GEAR.' When initially hearing 2;800 FT; I thought it was low because on the DME ARC it states 3;800 FT. The pilot flying and our third pilot in the jump seat heard me read back 2;800 FT and didn't question my response. Shortly after receiving the EGPWS warning Approach Control told us we were at 2;700 FT and that we were cleared to 3;800 FT and to climb back up to 3;800 FT. I mentioned to Approach I had understood and read back 2;800 FT and we were climbing to 3;800 FT. This all happened rather quickly; fortunately the weather was scattered clouds and visibility was good along with the Controller catching the mistake. I feel the language barrier added to this error. I let the Controller lead me into a false sense of security when he gave us a vector of 103 degrees thinking this Military Controller is very precise; normally vectors are given in 5 degree increments. Next time I will follow my gut and question the Controller.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2013 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.