37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 1041688 |
Time | |
Date | 201210 |
Local Time Of Day | 1801-2400 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | ZZZ.Airport |
State Reference | US |
Environment | |
Flight Conditions | VMC |
Light | Night |
Aircraft 1 | |
Make Model Name | Jet/Long Ranger/206 |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 135 |
Flight Phase | Parked |
Route In Use | Direct |
Flight Plan | VFR |
Component | |
Aircraft Component | Turbine Engine |
Person 1 | |
Function | Captain Single Pilot Pilot Flying |
Qualification | Flight Crew Multiengine Flight Crew Rotorcraft Flight Crew Air Transport Pilot (ATP) Flight Crew Commercial |
Experience | Flight Crew Last 90 Days 12 Flight Crew Total 14200 Flight Crew Type 54 |
Events | |
Anomaly | Aircraft Equipment Problem Critical Deviation - Procedural Published Material / Policy |
Narrative:
Pilot exceeded tot limits during engine start. The aircraft was then flown with an unknown mechanical irregularity. The first start attempt was made with the main fuel switch in the off position. The engine started but did not reach operating RPM before flaming-out. The pilot reconfigured the aircraft and restarted the engine. The tot indication began flashing after engine start. The pilot mistakenly thought the aircraft had not experienced a hot start because of similarities between the tot gage and the torque gage. The pilot interpreted the tot flashing display as an impending hot start and only discovered the actual hot start after consulting with maintenance control upon landing. The engine required a hot section inspection; but there was no damage found. Contributing factors: 1) tot and torque both flash. One indicates an actual exceedance; the other an impending exceedance. Each has a different action required. 2) night conditions with poor cockpit lighting. 3) limited experience in the aircraft. 4) minimal flight training during indoctrination. 5) very minimal systems training. 6) attention was diverted from the tot during start to ensure the main rotor was turning at 25%. 7) failure to use the checklist. The company's expected standard is to be in the air within seven minutes of receiving an EMS flight request. That includes getting the aircraft out of the hangar; checklist completion; and engine start. Corrective action: 1) the bell 206l3 being flown has no over torque or over temp protection. More time should be spent during training to ensure the pilot has a complete understanding of the tot indications and their significance. 2) less emphasis on getting in the air in seven minutes and more emphasis on using the checklist.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: Bell 206 pilot attributed failure to recognize a hot start to Temperature and Torque gauge similarity; poor cockpit lighting; limited experience in the aircraft; requirement to monitor rotor RPM; failure to use the checklist; minimal training and time pressure.
Narrative: Pilot exceeded TOT limits during engine start. The aircraft was then flown with an unknown mechanical irregularity. The first start attempt was made with the main fuel switch in the OFF position. The engine started but did not reach operating RPM before flaming-out. The pilot reconfigured the aircraft and restarted the engine. The TOT indication began flashing after engine start. The pilot mistakenly thought the aircraft had not experienced a hot start because of similarities between the TOT gage and the torque gage. The pilot interpreted the TOT flashing display as an impending hot start and only discovered the actual hot start after consulting with Maintenance Control upon landing. The engine required a hot section inspection; but there was no damage found. Contributing Factors: 1) TOT and Torque both flash. One indicates an actual exceedance; the other an impending exceedance. Each has a different action required. 2) Night conditions with poor cockpit lighting. 3) Limited experience in the aircraft. 4) Minimal flight training during indoctrination. 5) VERY minimal systems training. 6) Attention was diverted from the TOT during start to ensure the main rotor was turning at 25%. 7) Failure to use the checklist. The company's expected standard is to be in the air within seven minutes of receiving an EMS flight request. That includes getting the aircraft out of the hangar; checklist completion; and engine start. Corrective Action: 1) The Bell 206L3 being flown has no over torque or over temp protection. More time should be spent during training to ensure the pilot has a COMPLETE understanding of the TOT indications and their significance. 2) Less emphasis on getting in the air in seven minutes and more emphasis on using the checklist.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2013 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.