37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 1059827 |
Time | |
Date | 201212 |
Local Time Of Day | 0601-1200 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | PCT.TRACON |
State Reference | VA |
Aircraft 1 | |
Make Model Name | Bonanza 35 |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 91 |
Flight Phase | Cruise |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Person 1 | |
Function | Pilot Not Flying |
Qualification | Flight Crew Multiengine Flight Crew Commercial Flight Crew Instrument |
Experience | Flight Crew Last 90 Days 30 Flight Crew Total 2200 Flight Crew Type 1000 |
Events | |
Anomaly | ATC Issue All Types Deviation - Procedural Published Material / Policy |
Narrative:
Took off from fdk. Flight was to go from fdk to anp; anp is in the sfra. Sfra flight plan was filed properly. Have been flying the sfra for a very long time. Potomac controllers are having a terrible time of receiving transponder signals (even though we are seeing reply lights on our transponders) and they are also having a difficult time hearing our comms in the area of the sfra boundary that is near fdk through the EMI VOR. This sets up a bad situation of planes being forced to fly circles or racetrack patterns outside the sfra until the controllers hear us and see us on their scopes. We were trying to get contact lower and kept going higher until comm and transponder could be barely usable by the controllers.our beechcraft has fairly modern avionics in it; garmin 430; king 76C; etc. All boxes test out perfectly and work elsewhere in the IFR system fine. The potomac communication and transponder arrangement is poor at best; in my opinion.we did not have any sfra or other regulation problems. I just want to tell someone that this is not a good or safe situation. In heavy traffic situations; you might have a number of planes orbiting outside of the kfdk area and the sfra; this is not a large flying area for multiple planes to be orbiting in an uncontrolled area.please have the FAA fix the transponder problem and the communication problem for flight into the sfra before a midair occurs.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: BE35 pilot reports difficulty obtaining clearance to enter the DCA SFRA from the north due to the inability of ATC to detect his transponder and those of many other pilots below the Class B floor of 3000 feet.
Narrative: Took off from FDK. Flight was to go from FDK to ANP; ANP is in the SFRA. SFRA flight plan was filed properly. Have been flying the SFRA for a very long time. Potomac controllers are having a terrible time of receiving transponder signals (even though we are seeing reply lights on our transponders) and they are also having a difficult time hearing our comms in the area of the SFRA boundary that is near FDK through the EMI VOR. This sets up a bad situation of planes being forced to fly circles or racetrack patterns outside the SFRA until the controllers hear us and see us on their scopes. We were trying to get contact lower and kept going higher until comm and transponder could be barely usable by the controllers.Our Beechcraft has fairly modern avionics in it; Garmin 430; King 76C; etc. All boxes test out perfectly and work elsewhere in the IFR system fine. The Potomac communication and transponder arrangement is poor at best; in my opinion.We did not have any SFRA or other regulation problems. I just want to tell someone that this is not a good or safe situation. In heavy traffic situations; you might have a number of planes orbiting outside of the KFDK area and the SFRA; this is not a large flying area for multiple planes to be orbiting in an uncontrolled area.Please have the FAA fix the transponder problem and the communication problem for flight into the SFRA before a midair occurs.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2013 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.