37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 1076526 |
Time | |
Date | 201303 |
Local Time Of Day | 1801-2400 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | ZZZ.Airport |
State Reference | US |
Aircraft 1 | |
Make Model Name | Cessna 340/340A |
Flight Phase | Final Approach |
Route In Use | Visual Approach |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Aircraft 2 | |
Make Model Name | TBM 700/TBM 850 |
Flight Phase | Initial Climb |
Route In Use | Vectors |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Person 1 | |
Function | Approach Departure |
Qualification | Air Traffic Control Fully Certified |
Events | |
Anomaly | ATC Issue All Types Aircraft Equipment Problem Critical Deviation - Procedural Published Material / Policy |
Narrative:
I was training a developmental on satellite. A C340 departed [a class D airport] and about 18 miles south called up with a rough running engine and wanted to return; the departure controller declared an emergency for him. When the C340 was about 12-14 miles south of [their departure airport]; tower called for a release of a northbound aircraft; my trainee said hold for release. I had her call right back and release the aircraft on a 330 heading as I saw it to be no factor with the inbound emergency. The departure controller kept the emergency on his frequency to avoid frequency changes. The departure; a TBM8 took longer to get airborne than I anticipated. The C340 did something I did not anticipate and headed right toward the departure end of runway 24. The C340 was already on the visual and talking to tower when the TBM8 came off. When the TBM8 came off and started his turn to the northwest; it appeared that the C340 was less than 3 miles and 1;000 ft from the TBM8. I eventually had divergence but am not sure if I had it in time; nor did I ask the tower if they were providing visual separation. At no time do I feel safety was compromised. It was just an unusual situation based upon pilot actions and delayed departure. I should have double checked that tower was providing visual.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: TRACON Controller described a conflict event between an inbound emergency aircraft and a departure when the departure was late in rolling; the reporter noting uncertainty regarding Tower visual separation applications.
Narrative: I was training a Developmental on satellite. A C340 departed [a Class D airport] and about 18 miles south called up with a rough running engine and wanted to return; the Departure Controller declared an emergency for him. When the C340 was about 12-14 miles south of [their departure airport]; Tower called for a release of a northbound aircraft; my Trainee said hold for release. I had her call right back and release the aircraft on a 330 heading as I saw it to be no factor with the inbound emergency. The Departure Controller kept the emergency on his frequency to avoid frequency changes. The departure; a TBM8 took longer to get airborne than I anticipated. The C340 did something I did not anticipate and headed right toward the departure end of Runway 24. The C340 was already on the visual and talking to Tower when the TBM8 came off. When the TBM8 came off and started his turn to the northwest; it appeared that the C340 was less than 3 miles and 1;000 FT from the TBM8. I eventually had divergence but am not sure if I had it in time; nor did I ask the Tower if they were providing visual separation. At no time do I feel safety was compromised. It was just an unusual situation based upon pilot actions and delayed departure. I should have double checked that Tower was providing visual.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2013 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.