Narrative:

Feb/tue/89 at xa local. We were, again, being vectored for sfo quiet bridge approach. We were advised that our parallel traffic was 12 O'clock and about 2000' below us. When we spotted our traffic it was directly beneath the nose of the aircraft. This practice is unsafe. It raises tensions in the cockpit to a level that should only be attained during an emergency, not during a 'normal' procedure. The parallel 'quiet bridge' and 'tip toe' visual approachs should discontinue before there is a serious accident. In the very least, spacing between parallel traffic should be increased to a minimum of 3 miles.

Google
 

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: WHILE BEING VECTORED FOR A PARALLEL VISUAL APCH REPORTER ACFT SIGHTED TRAFFIC FOR PARALLEL RWY DIRECTLY BELOW THEIR ACFT.

Narrative: FEB/TUE/89 AT XA LOCAL. WE WERE, AGAIN, BEING VECTORED FOR SFO QUIET BRIDGE APCH. WE WERE ADVISED THAT OUR PARALLEL TFC WAS 12 O'CLOCK AND ABOUT 2000' BELOW US. WHEN WE SPOTTED OUR TFC IT WAS DIRECTLY BENEATH THE NOSE OF THE ACFT. THIS PRACTICE IS UNSAFE. IT RAISES TENSIONS IN THE COCKPIT TO A LEVEL THAT SHOULD ONLY BE ATTAINED DURING AN EMER, NOT DURING A 'NORMAL' PROCEDURE. THE PARALLEL 'QUIET BRIDGE' AND 'TIP TOE' VISUAL APCHS SHOULD DISCONTINUE BEFORE THERE IS A SERIOUS ACCIDENT. IN THE VERY LEAST, SPACING BETWEEN PARALLEL TFC SHOULD BE INCREASED TO A MINIMUM OF 3 MILES.

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of August 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.