37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 1110346 |
Time | |
Date | 201308 |
Local Time Of Day | 0001-0600 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | ZZZ.Airport |
State Reference | US |
Environment | |
Flight Conditions | VMC |
Light | Daylight |
Aircraft 1 | |
Make Model Name | EMB ERJ 190/195 ER/LR |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 121 |
Flight Phase | Climb |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Component | |
Aircraft Component | Fuel Quantity-Pressure Indication |
Person 1 | |
Function | Captain Pilot Not Flying |
Qualification | Flight Crew Air Transport Pilot (ATP) |
Events | |
Anomaly | Aircraft Equipment Problem Critical Inflight Event / Encounter Fuel Issue |
Narrative:
Climbing through 3;500 ft the landing gear and flaps were retracted and the after takeoff checklist was complete. The first officer selected climb 1 thrust and announced doing so; I acknowledged. Shortly after as the autopilot accelerated the aircraft to 250 KTS; the icas message 'fuel 2 lo level' appeared. The first officer was assigned to continue flying the aircraft and to operate radio communications while I read aloud the QRH procedure. I sent several ACARS messages to dispatch informing him of the situation. The icas message (fuel 2 lo level) was no longer indicated; there were no indications of any abnormalities on any aircraft systems. We continued on route and advised dispatch that we considered the icas fuel warning to be erroneous; and of our intention to land at ZZZ; our nearest suitable airport at that time. Dispatch concurred. We requested expeditious routing and emergency equipment standing by. The flight attendants were briefed of the status and to plan a normal landing. We suspect the warning was erroneous; this aircraft has a history of erroneous indications /warnings; however; we chose to deal with the situation as if there was an actual low fuel issue to be extra cautious.given the numerous erroneous indications/warnings associated with this aircraft; I suggest that all the electronics be thoroughly inspected for faults.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: After evaluating the receipt of a FUEL 2 LO warning light aboard an EMB-190 with a history of erroneous warnings; the flight crew opted to divert to the nearest suitable airport despite the history.
Narrative: Climbing through 3;500 FT the landing gear and flaps were retracted and the After Takeoff Checklist was complete. The First Officer selected Climb 1 Thrust and announced doing so; I acknowledged. Shortly after as the autopilot accelerated the aircraft to 250 KTS; the ICAS message 'FUEL 2 LO LEVEL' appeared. The First Officer was assigned to continue flying the aircraft and to operate radio communications while I read aloud the QRH Procedure. I sent several ACARS messages to Dispatch informing him of the situation. The ICAS message (FUEL 2 LO LEVEL) was no longer indicated; there were no indications of any abnormalities on any aircraft systems. We continued on route and advised Dispatch that we considered the ICAS FUEL Warning to be erroneous; and of our intention to land at ZZZ; our nearest suitable airport at that time. Dispatch concurred. We requested expeditious routing and Emergency Equipment standing by. The flight attendants were briefed of the status and to plan a normal landing. We suspect the warning was erroneous; this aircraft has a history of erroneous indications /warnings; however; we chose to deal with the situation as if there was an actual low fuel issue to be extra cautious.Given the numerous erroneous indications/warnings associated with this aircraft; I suggest that all the electronics be thoroughly inspected for faults.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2013 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.