37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 1121176 |
Time | |
Date | 201310 |
Local Time Of Day | 1201-1800 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | ZZZ.Airport |
State Reference | US |
Environment | |
Light | Daylight |
Aircraft 1 | |
Make Model Name | B737-300 |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 121 |
Flight Phase | Parked |
Component | |
Aircraft Component | Flap/Slat Indication |
Person 1 | |
Function | Technician |
Qualification | Maintenance Airframe Maintenance Powerplant |
Events | |
Anomaly | Aircraft Equipment Problem Less Severe Deviation - Procedural Published Material / Policy |
Narrative:
Crew reported number 2 slat on overhead and transit light was intermittent in flight and maintenance was checking it out downstairs [in the east/east compartment]. I told him [captain] to have maintenance call me when through checking. Maintenance called and said it was the number 3 slat and not the number 2; and he could find no faults. So MEL xx-X-04 was issued. After log page was entered into maintenance computer program; a co-worker notified me it was entered as krueger flap and not slat. Looked at aircraft routing and found it made a round trip (ZZZ/ZZZ1/ZZZ) and was en route back to (ZZZ). [I] took the aircraft out of service for repair. Better 'read back' procedure should have been followed. I thought the captain was reading his write-up; but I now do not believe it was written up yet; and the mechanic read back the MEL; and not the write-up. I should have asked him to read back the write-up.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: A Maintenance Controller describes the confusion that led to an MEL deferral of a #2 Slat Overhead and Transit light intermittent in flight report; when in fact #3 Krueger flap was the discrepancy. The B737-300 aircraft was later removed from service for repairs.
Narrative: Crew reported Number 2 Slat on overhead and transit light was intermittent in flight and Maintenance was checking it out downstairs [in the E/E Compartment]. I told him [Captain] to have Maintenance call me when through checking. Maintenance called and said it was the Number 3 Slat and not the Number 2; and he could find no faults. So MEL XX-X-04 was issued. After log page was entered into Maintenance Computer Program; a co-worker notified me it was entered as Krueger flap and not slat. Looked at aircraft routing and found it made a round trip (ZZZ/ZZZ1/ZZZ) and was en route back to (ZZZ). [I] took the aircraft out of service for repair. Better 'read back' procedure should have been followed. I thought the Captain was reading his write-up; but I now do not believe it was written up yet; and the Mechanic read back the MEL; and not the write-up. I should have asked him to read back the write-up.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2013 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.