37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 1144392 |
Time | |
Date | 201401 |
Local Time Of Day | 1801-2400 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | ZZZ.ARTCC |
State Reference | US |
Environment | |
Flight Conditions | VMC |
Light | Dusk |
Aircraft 1 | |
Make Model Name | EMB ERJ 145 ER/LR |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 121 |
Flight Phase | Climb |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Component | |
Aircraft Component | Gust Lock |
Person 1 | |
Function | Captain Pilot Not Flying |
Qualification | Flight Crew Air Transport Pilot (ATP) |
Person 2 | |
Function | Pilot Not Flying First Officer |
Events | |
Anomaly | Aircraft Equipment Problem Less Severe Deviation - Procedural Published Material / Policy |
Narrative:
This is a correction to the early report submitted. 1. All required checks were completed prior to takeoff as per aom I. 2. At the takeoff the gust lock appeared to be off. 3. I cannot recall if thrust levers were in detent. 4. While climbing out I noticed ac was not climbing normally and took over ac. I then realized the gust lock was in the intermediate position. 5. We declared an emergency and made an uneventful safe landing. We returned to gate and wrote up gust lock. 6. The gust lock was written up because it was the identifiable problem at hand which prevented movement of the thrust levers. After several days of replaying the event in my mind. I remembered the release being in a position where it was blocking the gust lock during the thrust setting procedure and I pulled it out. This action could have returned the gust lock to the intermediate position during the takeoff roll.I suggest 1. Keep gust lock area free of anything. 2. Maybe a design changes that prevent the gust lock from blocking the thrust levers. Or something like shear pins in the bar and release lever attachment points.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: After takeoff an EMB-145 Captain determined the aircraft was not climbing normally and discovered the Gust Lock in an intermediate position blocking the thrust levers; so an emergency was declared and the flight returned to the departure airport.
Narrative: This is a correction to the early report submitted. 1. All required checks were completed prior to takeoff as per AOM I. 2. At the takeoff the gust lock appeared to be off. 3. I cannot recall if thrust levers were in detent. 4. While climbing out I noticed ac was not climbing normally and took over ac. I then realized the gust lock was in the intermediate position. 5. We declared an emergency and made an uneventful safe landing. We returned to gate and wrote up gust lock. 6. The gust lock was written up because it was the identifiable problem at hand which prevented movement of the Thrust levers. After several days of replaying the event in my mind. I remembered the release being in a position where it was blocking the gust lock during the thrust setting procedure and I pulled it out. This action could have returned the gust lock to the intermediate position during the takeoff roll.I suggest 1. Keep gust lock area free of anything. 2. Maybe a design changes that prevent the gust lock from blocking the thrust levers. Or something like shear pins in the bar and release lever attachment points.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.