37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 1162023 |
Time | |
Date | 201404 |
Local Time Of Day | 1201-1800 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | ZZZ.Airport |
State Reference | US |
Environment | |
Flight Conditions | VMC |
Light | Daylight |
Aircraft 1 | |
Make Model Name | PA-28 Cherokee/Archer/Dakota/Pillan/Warrior |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 91 |
Flight Phase | Parked |
Route In Use | Direct |
Flight Plan | VFR |
Component | |
Aircraft Component | Electronic Flt Bag (EFB) |
Person 1 | |
Function | Single Pilot Pilot Flying |
Qualification | Flight Crew Multiengine Flight Crew Flight Instructor Flight Crew Instrument |
Experience | Flight Crew Last 90 Days 22 Flight Crew Total 883 Flight Crew Type 115 |
Events | |
Anomaly | Deviation - Procedural Published Material / Policy Deviation - Speed All Types |
Narrative:
I filed and flew two VFR out and back legs. I planned the flight on my ipad using garmin pro pilot; but filed using [a flight planning website]. I had just landed at my home airport and was putting the aircraft in the hangar when a car drove up and the driver asked if I had a VFR flight plan. I replied in the affirmative; and stated that I had just landed and was about to close it. The driver said that the FSS had called the airport and was looking for me. I immediately closed the flight plan; but I was puzzled as to why this had occurred. Upon arrival back home; I looked at the filing. The online software automatically populates the speeds for aircraft type; while the pilot enters the other data. The software [I] had used the correct airspeed for the first leg; but then used an airspeed 25 KTS faster for the second leg. Because I was using the ipad enroute; I didn't catch the discrepancy. I am going to be much more cautious about automatic online filing; and review each item more closely. It is my fault that this occurred. The FSS was right to check on me; and I'm grateful they did.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: A VFR PA-28 pilot was advised after a cross country that Flight Service was looking for him because he was overdue. Upon investigating; the pilot determined that the return leg speed the iPad software calculated; and he then filed for; was higher than normal speed for his aircraft type.
Narrative: I filed and flew two VFR out and back legs. I planned the flight on my iPad using Garmin Pro Pilot; but filed using [a flight planning website]. I had just landed at my home airport and was putting the aircraft in the hangar when a car drove up and the driver asked if I had a VFR flight plan. I replied in the affirmative; and stated that I had just landed and was about to close it. The driver said that the FSS had called the airport and was looking for me. I immediately closed the flight plan; but I was puzzled as to why this had occurred. Upon arrival back home; I looked at the filing. The online software automatically populates the speeds for aircraft type; while the pilot enters the other data. The software [I] had used the correct airspeed for the first leg; but then used an airspeed 25 KTS faster for the second leg. Because I was using the iPad enroute; I didn't catch the discrepancy. I am going to be much more cautious about automatic online filing; and review each item more closely. It is my fault that this occurred. The FSS was right to check on me; and I'm grateful they did.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.