37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 1162790 |
Time | |
Date | 201404 |
Local Time Of Day | 1801-2400 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | MIA.Tower |
State Reference | FL |
Environment | |
Flight Conditions | VMC |
Light | Night |
Aircraft 1 | |
Make Model Name | Large Transport |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 121 |
Flight Phase | Final Approach |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Aircraft 2 | |
Make Model Name | A380 |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 121 |
Flight Phase | Takeoff |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Person 1 | |
Function | Captain Pilot Flying |
Qualification | Flight Crew Air Transport Pilot (ATP) |
Events | |
Anomaly | ATC Issue All Types Conflict Ground Conflict Less Severe Inflight Event / Encounter Other / Unknown |
Narrative:
While operating as pilot flying of aircraft X cleared for the ILS or localizer runway 9 approach in VMC. Switched mia tower 123.9 at gritt intersection and instructed to slow to final approach speed for separation on a departing A380. Observed the 'super' holding short of runway 9 and instructed first officer; pilot monitoring; to request a sidestep to the northern runway complex 8L/right; request denied for traffic conflict. Tower cleared the super to line up and wait; then for takeoff. As we passed 500 feet the super was beginning rotation. Above the paved overrun we encountered moderate turbulence from the A380's initial takeoff thrust application and I called for the go-around. Vectored 140 degrees heading on climb out and switched departure for downwind vectors and base turn to iness intersection; visual approach and landing runway 9 uneventful.upon landing I requested and received the tower supervisor's phone number. Discussion revealed aircraft separation to be legal; but the minimum allowed. Assuming this to be true; and assuming the super crew competent and expeditious in conduct of their takeoff; I conclude and must state emphatically that the current separation standards for large aircraft landing behind a departing super are woefully inadequate and present a clear hazard to flight safety. Increase separation required between arriving large aircraft behind a departing super.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: Air carrier flight crew made a go-around on short final due to wake turbulence from departing Super aircraft.
Narrative: While operating as pilot flying of Aircraft X cleared for the ILS or LOC RWY 9 approach in VMC. Switched MIA Tower 123.9 at GRITT intersection and instructed to slow to final approach speed for separation on a departing A380. Observed the 'Super' holding short of Runway 9 and instructed First Officer; pilot monitoring; to request a sidestep to the northern Runway Complex 8L/R; request denied for traffic conflict. Tower cleared the Super to line up and wait; then for takeoff. As we passed 500 feet the Super was beginning rotation. Above the paved overrun we encountered moderate turbulence from the A380's initial takeoff thrust application and I called for the go-around. Vectored 140 degrees heading on climb out and switched departure for downwind vectors and base turn to INESS intersection; visual approach and landing Runway 9 uneventful.Upon landing I requested and received the Tower Supervisor's phone number. Discussion revealed aircraft separation to be legal; but the minimum allowed. Assuming this to be true; and assuming the Super crew competent and expeditious in conduct of their takeoff; I conclude and must state emphatically that the current separation standards for large aircraft landing behind a departing Super are woefully inadequate and present a clear hazard to flight safety. Increase separation required between arriving large aircraft behind a departing Super.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.