37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 116798 |
Time | |
Date | 198907 |
Day | Tue |
Local Time Of Day | 1201 To 1800 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | airport : tph |
State Reference | NV |
Altitude | msl bound lower : 16000 msl bound upper : 17000 |
Environment | |
Flight Conditions | VMC |
Light | Daylight |
Aircraft 1 | |
Controlling Facilities | artcc : zoa |
Operator | common carrier : air carrier |
Make Model Name | Medium Large Transport, Low Wing, 2 Turbojet Eng |
Flight Phase | climbout : intermediate altitude |
Route In Use | departure other |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Aircraft 2 | |
Operator | other |
Make Model Name | Military Transport |
Flight Phase | climbout : intermediate altitude |
Route In Use | departure other |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Person 1 | |
Affiliation | government : faa |
Function | controller : radar |
Qualification | controller : radar |
ASRS Report | 116798 |
Person 2 | |
Affiliation | company : air carrier |
Function | flight crew : captain oversight : pic |
Qualification | pilot : atp |
Events | |
Anomaly | non adherence : published procedure non adherence : required legal separation other spatial deviation |
Independent Detector | atc equipment other atc equipment : unspecified other controllera |
Resolutory Action | controller : issued new clearance |
Consequence | Other |
Miss Distance | horizontal : 24000 vertical : 0 |
Supplementary | |
Primary Problem | ATC Human Performance |
Air Traffic Incident | Operational Error |
Narrative:
Both aircraft departed tnx on the same route climbing to same altitude. Route of flight took them under refueling operation FL180 B200, worked by another facility. As the air carrier X was overtaking mlt Y rapidly, I failed to notice it in time to effect vertical separation. I descended air carrier X to 160 and tried to climb mlt Y to FL180. Contributing, etc: a) 90 percent of military aircraft on that procedure are high performance. I thought mlt Y was a (type aircraft). B) I was working alone, normal for that sector. It was very complex with numerous pointouts/coordination calls to be made. C) at the time of, and just previous to the occurrence, I was trying to issue traffic/safety alert to a military in conflict with a VFR. The radio xmissions were of such poor quality that I didn't know whether or not the military had the traffic and had to turn him out. D) coordination, traffic, refueling, and heavy complexity involved, took my time, frequency and attention away from the developing situation. East) better staffing and equipment and procedures may have averted the occurrence.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: TWO ACFT CLIMBING OUT ON THE SAME ROUTE AND ALT WITH THE SECOND ACFT OVERTAKING THE FIRST. LESS THAN STANDARD SEPARATION RESULTED.
Narrative: BOTH ACFT DEPARTED TNX ON THE SAME ROUTE CLIMBING TO SAME ALT. ROUTE OF FLT TOOK THEM UNDER REFUELING OPERATION FL180 B200, WORKED BY ANOTHER FAC. AS THE ACR X WAS OVERTAKING MLT Y RAPIDLY, I FAILED TO NOTICE IT IN TIME TO EFFECT VERTICAL SEPARATION. I DESCENDED ACR X TO 160 AND TRIED TO CLIMB MLT Y TO FL180. CONTRIBUTING, ETC: A) 90 PERCENT OF MIL ACFT ON THAT PROC ARE HIGH PERFORMANCE. I THOUGHT MLT Y WAS A (TYPE ACFT). B) I WAS WORKING ALONE, NORMAL FOR THAT SECTOR. IT WAS VERY COMPLEX WITH NUMEROUS POINTOUTS/COORD CALLS TO BE MADE. C) AT THE TIME OF, AND JUST PREVIOUS TO THE OCCURRENCE, I WAS TRYING TO ISSUE TFC/SAFETY ALERT TO A MIL IN CONFLICT WITH A VFR. THE RADIO XMISSIONS WERE OF SUCH POOR QUALITY THAT I DIDN'T KNOW WHETHER OR NOT THE MIL HAD THE TFC AND HAD TO TURN HIM OUT. D) COORD, TFC, REFUELING, AND HEAVY COMPLEXITY INVOLVED, TOOK MY TIME, FREQUENCY AND ATTN AWAY FROM THE DEVELOPING SITUATION. E) BETTER STAFFING AND EQUIPMENT AND PROCS MAY HAVE AVERTED THE OCCURRENCE.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of August 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.