37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 1172361 |
Time | |
Date | 201405 |
Local Time Of Day | 0001-0600 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | N90.TRACON |
State Reference | NY |
Aircraft 1 | |
Make Model Name | Any Unknown or Unlisted Aircraft Manufacturer |
Flight Phase | Final Approach |
Route In Use | Other Instrument Approach |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Person 1 | |
Function | Approach |
Qualification | Air Traffic Control Fully Certified |
Experience | Air Traffic Control Time Certified In Pos 1 (yrs) 2.5 |
Events | |
Anomaly | ATC Issue All Types Deviation - Procedural Published Material / Policy |
Narrative:
Jfk [and] lga were both landing ILS 13; and coordinating to change approaches to both land ILS 22. Because of the close proximity of these airports; these are not easy runway changes; and require a lot of coordination between the two sectors. I heard the lga supervisor; give the belmont airspace to jfk. This allowed jfk to start landing ILS 22. Unfortunately; lga still had 5 aircraft being vectored for ILS 13 approach. Jfk cannot land ILS 22 in the belmont airspace when lga is landing ILS 13. The ILS 13 go-around procedure is runway heading climb to 2;000 feet; which goes right into the belmont airspace. I advised my supervisor of his mistake and told him to keep the airspace until the last lga 13 arrival had landed. He responded 'don't worry about it'. I was then instructed to relieve the final controller; and I personally had to clear the last of the lga arrivals to runway 13 with absolutely no protection for a go-around. Lga was in IFR conditions; and windshear had been an issue all day; the likelihood of a go-around was very high. A supervisor having such disregard for aircraft safety is absolutely frightening. I recommend everyone be briefed on all conditional airspace in our facility; and be reminded why airspace delegation is so critical. We are lucky none of the lga arrivals went around; I'm afraid of what may happen next time someone is so negligent.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: N90 Controller describes airport configuration change that he feels is unsafe.
Narrative: JFK [and] LGA were both landing ILS 13; and coordinating to change approaches to both land ILS 22. Because of the close proximity of these airports; these are not easy runway changes; and require a lot of coordination between the two sectors. I heard the LGA Supervisor; give the Belmont airspace to JFK. This allowed JFK to start landing ILS 22. Unfortunately; LGA still had 5 aircraft being vectored for ILS 13 approach. JFK cannot land ILS 22 in the Belmont airspace when LGA is landing ILS 13. The ILS 13 go-around procedure is runway heading climb to 2;000 feet; which goes right into the Belmont airspace. I advised my Supervisor of his mistake and told him to keep the airspace until the last LGA 13 arrival had landed. He responded 'don't worry about it'. I was then instructed to relieve the Final Controller; and I personally had to clear the last of the LGA arrivals to Runway 13 with absolutely no protection for a go-around. LGA was in IFR conditions; and windshear had been an issue all day; the likelihood of a go-around was very high. A supervisor having such disregard for aircraft safety is absolutely frightening. I recommend everyone be briefed on all conditional airspace in our facility; and be reminded why airspace delegation is so critical. We are lucky none of the LGA arrivals went around; I'm afraid of what may happen next time someone is so negligent.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.