Narrative:

Aircraft X was cleared for the visual approach; already established on runway 18R localizer descending out of 4;000 ft showing about 170 knots. Aircraft Y was about 7 miles northwest of aircraft X at the same altitude. I told aircraft Y to fly heading 150 until established on the runway 18C localizer cleared visual approach runway 18C. Aircraft Y was not issued a speed since he was the only aircraft going to 18C (showing about 230 knots). I was using the rule 15 degree course divergence (actually had 30 degrees) with aircraft X on a 180 and aircraft Y on a 150 until established on the 18C localizer. They both were on different runways with 18R and 18C. Aircraft Y got within about 2 miles before he passed aircraft X and established on runway 18C. I was counseled by a supervisor that this was a deal because I needed 45 degrees divergence. I do not understand this. I do this all the time and I am unsure what I did wrong. I am not sure who to talk to about this so I am filling out this report. Also many supervisors are saying I need to apply wake turbulence separation which I also believe to be untrue since I was not near the landing threshold. Basically I was using 15 degrees divergence until both were established on their localizers and cleared visual approach and I was told this is wrong. We need to all be on the same page with this. I train many people and want to make sure I am teaching them right.

Google
 

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: CLT TRACON Controller describes arrival situation to parallel runways using what he thought was 15 degree course divergence. Controller had a loss of separation.

Narrative: Aircraft X was cleared for the visual approach; already established on Runway 18R localizer descending out of 4;000 FT showing about 170 knots. Aircraft Y was about 7 miles northwest of Aircraft X at the same altitude. I told Aircraft Y to fly heading 150 until established on the Runway 18C localizer cleared visual approach Runway 18C. Aircraft Y was not issued a speed since he was the only aircraft going to 18C (showing about 230 knots). I was using the rule 15 degree course divergence (actually had 30 degrees) with Aircraft X on a 180 and Aircraft Y on a 150 until established on the 18C localizer. They both were on different runways with 18R and 18C. Aircraft Y got within about 2 miles before he passed Aircraft X and established on runway 18C. I was counseled by a Supervisor that this was a deal because I needed 45 degrees divergence. I do not understand this. I do this all the time and I am unsure what I did wrong. I am not sure who to talk to about this so I am filling out this report. Also many supervisors are saying I need to apply wake turbulence separation which I also believe to be untrue since I was not near the landing threshold. Basically I was using 15 degrees divergence until both were established on their localizers and cleared visual approach and I was told this is wrong. We need to all be on the same page with this. I train many people and want to make sure I am teaching them right.

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.