Narrative:

On a descent from FL290; I engaged the VNAV function for descent. This was the first time I'd tried using this outside of the simulator. Immediately upon selecting this mode; the aircraft pitched up and began climbing. I abandoned the VNAV function and selected indicated mach for descent. I began a discussion with the captain about various descent modes and did not press the mach changeover button to get the aircraft to descend in IAS instead of mach. Soon; we noticed the speed was increasing towards vmo. I disconnected the autopilot and readjusted pitch to slow the aircraft. For my part; more vigilance in monitoring the aircraft's performance while under automation was called for. There were several traps that I could have been more aware of. Beginning a descent at IAS/mach changeover altitude should probably have been initiated in IAS instead of in mach. Also; more training in VNAV in the initial [training center] would also have helped. VNAV descents and climbs were not trained to any degree of proficiency and were left for us to learn on the line if we desired.

Google
 

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: MD83 flight crew is informed after the flight that Vmo was exceeded by 19 KIAS during descent. The event is described by the Captain as a new hire First Officer attempting to learn the auto flight system on the line; since the company will not do this training in the simulator.

Narrative: On a descent from FL290; I engaged the VNAV function for descent. This was the first time I'd tried using this outside of the simulator. Immediately upon selecting this mode; the aircraft pitched up and began climbing. I abandoned the VNAV function and selected indicated Mach for descent. I began a discussion with the Captain about various descent modes and did not press the mach changeover button to get the aircraft to descend in IAS instead of mach. Soon; we noticed the speed was increasing towards Vmo. I disconnected the autopilot and readjusted pitch to slow the aircraft. For my part; more vigilance in monitoring the aircraft's performance while under automation was called for. There were several traps that I could have been more aware of. Beginning a descent at IAS/Mach changeover altitude should probably have been initiated in IAS instead of in Mach. Also; more training in VNAV in the initial [training center] would also have helped. VNAV descents and climbs were not trained to any degree of proficiency and were left for us to learn on the line if we desired.

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.