Narrative:

A VFR x-country flight was planned from falcon field in mesa, az. Fuel gauges during the flight gave expected indications during the trip, and preflight planning indicated the trip would be completed with 30 min VFR fuel reserve plus 15 mins fuel to spare. At the end of the flight, 2 mi from the end of final approach to runway 22L (a wide left base, followed by final, had been instructed by tower) the engine became rough and stopped in about 15 second. I advised tower that I had engine failure, and that a suitable landing area (new uninhabited subdivision street) had been identified as the safest choice. The fuel gauges still indicated expected fuel levels at engine failure. An uneventful landing was made on the street. The plane was eventually refueled, taking 22.8 gal (only 22.5 gal usable in this aircraft). Hindsight: 1) stupid to plan a flight near VFR mins. 2) should have bought some fuel at tia during return stop, but late for work and gauges/times were looking good. Even though small aircraft manual gives performance figures for an aircraft in good condition, not brand new, I should probably add 10-20% to all fuel burn figures, something I have never been instructed to do while attaining my ratings.

Google
 

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: LIGHT SINGLE ENGINE ACFT RUNS OUT OF FUEL 2 MILES SHORT OF DESTINATION.

Narrative: A VFR X-COUNTRY FLT WAS PLANNED FROM FALCON FIELD IN MESA, AZ. FUEL GAUGES DURING THE FLT GAVE EXPECTED INDICATIONS DURING THE TRIP, AND PREFLT PLANNING INDICATED THE TRIP WOULD BE COMPLETED WITH 30 MIN VFR FUEL RESERVE PLUS 15 MINS FUEL TO SPARE. AT THE END OF THE FLT, 2 MI FROM THE END OF FINAL APCH TO RWY 22L (A WIDE LEFT BASE, FOLLOWED BY FINAL, HAD BEEN INSTRUCTED BY TWR) THE ENGINE BECAME ROUGH AND STOPPED IN ABOUT 15 SEC. I ADVISED TWR THAT I HAD ENGINE FAILURE, AND THAT A SUITABLE LNDG AREA (NEW UNINHABITED SUBDIVISION STREET) HAD BEEN IDENTIFIED AS THE SAFEST CHOICE. THE FUEL GAUGES STILL INDICATED EXPECTED FUEL LEVELS AT ENGINE FAILURE. AN UNEVENTFUL LNDG WAS MADE ON THE STREET. THE PLANE WAS EVENTUALLY REFUELED, TAKING 22.8 GAL (ONLY 22.5 GAL USABLE IN THIS ACFT). HINDSIGHT: 1) STUPID TO PLAN A FLT NEAR VFR MINS. 2) SHOULD HAVE BOUGHT SOME FUEL AT TIA DURING RETURN STOP, BUT LATE FOR WORK AND GAUGES/TIMES WERE LOOKING GOOD. EVEN THOUGH SMA MANUAL GIVES PERFORMANCE FIGURES FOR AN ACFT IN GOOD CONDITION, NOT BRAND NEW, I SHOULD PROBABLY ADD 10-20% TO ALL FUEL BURN FIGURES, SOMETHING I HAVE NEVER BEEN INSTRUCTED TO DO WHILE ATTAINING MY RATINGS.

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of August 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.