37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 1202512 |
Time | |
Date | 201409 |
Local Time Of Day | 0001-0600 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | ZZZ.Airport |
State Reference | US |
Environment | |
Flight Conditions | IMC |
Light | Dawn |
Aircraft 1 | |
Make Model Name | MD-11 |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 121 |
Flight Phase | Final Approach Initial Approach |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Component | |
Aircraft Component | Autothrottle/Speed Control |
Person 1 | |
Function | First Officer Pilot Flying |
Experience | Flight Crew Last 90 Days 16 Flight Crew Total 13349 Flight Crew Type 1078 |
Person 2 | |
Function | Captain Pilot Not Flying |
Qualification | Flight Crew Air Transport Pilot (ATP) |
Events | |
Anomaly | Aircraft Equipment Problem Less Severe Deviation - Altitude Crossing Restriction Not Met Deviation - Procedural Published Material / Policy Inflight Event / Encounter CFTT / CFIT Inflight Event / Encounter Unstabilized Approach |
Narrative:
After flying all night; with weather in the immediate area and the autothrottles were inoperative; we elected to fly the RNAV runway xxr. We were vectored around several thunderstorm cells. While on the west side of the if; we were vectored to fly direct to the if to intercept the runway and fly the approach. Level at 3000 ft and cleared for the approach; I was very focus on maintain proper speed for the leg of the approach. With turbulence in the area; it was a little difficult to get the right power setting to maintain an approach speed within 10 knots of the target speed. As we flew over the second waypoint; I started down. The FMS was showing I was about 200 ft high at the final approach fix (FAF). I continued the approach. As we started to breakout; we both decided we were too high to continue the approach to land. I elected to commence the go-around. Cleaned up the aircraft and requested a 2nd attempt. On our second attempt; we were vectored for the ILS xyr; GS out of service approach. The captain set up the approach and briefed me on it so I can maintain my focus on the throttles. Level at 4000; we were cleared to descend to 3000 ft and cleared for the approach. I started to reduce the power and call for slats and flaps. I started descending down to the MDA; while trying to control the speed. The speed was fluctuating a lot. I am assuming because of the continuous light turbulence. We crossed the FAF at 2500 ft; I selected 1000 ft on the vsi. Just as we were breaking out; I heard a 'too low. Terrain'; I immediately pushed the throttles to the breaking bar to commence the CFIT recovery. As I pulled back on the throttles I can see the yellow numbers above the N1 indicators on engine number 1 & 2. Once cleaned up and level off; I elected to have the captain land the aircraft. The captain requested the ILS runway xyr approach. I set up the approach; briefed and he landed without any further events. I did notice the captain was very focus on the power setting to help control the speed. We are never flying a plane with the autothrottles inoperative. To add to it; after flying throughout the night; we had to fly an approach in IFR conditions; with thunder storm cells around the immediate area of the airport with continuous light turbulence. Might not sound like much; but when it happens. It turns into a handful.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: A MD-11 with MELed autothrottles was flown all night and arrived at an IMC airport with only non precision approaches. Following two go-arounds; one after an EGPWS warning; the fatigued First Officer gave the aircraft to the Captain.
Narrative: After flying all night; with weather in the immediate area and the autothrottles were inoperative; we elected to fly the RNAV Runway XXR. We were vectored around several thunderstorm cells. While on the West side of the IF; we were vectored to fly direct to the IF to intercept the runway and fly the approach. Level at 3000 ft and cleared for the approach; I was very focus on maintain proper speed for the leg of the approach. With turbulence in the area; it was a little difficult to get the right power setting to maintain an approach speed within 10 knots of the target speed. As we flew over the second waypoint; I started down. The FMS was showing I was about 200 ft high at the final approach fix (FAF). I continued the approach. As we started to breakout; we both decided we were too high to continue the approach to land. I elected to commence the go-around. Cleaned up the aircraft and requested a 2nd attempt. On our second attempt; we were vectored for the ILS XYR; GS out of service approach. The Captain set up the approach and briefed me on it so I can maintain my focus on the throttles. Level at 4000; we were cleared to descend to 3000 ft and cleared for the approach. I started to reduce the power and call for slats and flaps. I started descending down to the MDA; while trying to control the speed. The speed was fluctuating a lot. I am assuming because of the continuous light turbulence. We crossed the FAF at 2500 ft; I selected 1000 ft on the VSI. Just as we were breaking out; I heard a 'Too Low. Terrain'; I immediately pushed the throttles to the breaking bar to commence the CFIT recovery. As I pulled back on the throttles I can see the yellow numbers above the N1 indicators on engine number 1 & 2. Once cleaned up and level off; I elected to have the Captain land the aircraft. The Captain requested the ILS RWY XYR approach. I set up the approach; briefed and he landed without any further events. I did notice the Captain was very focus on the power setting to help control the speed. We are never flying a plane with the autothrottles inoperative. To add to it; after flying throughout the night; we had to fly an approach in IFR conditions; with thunder storm cells around the immediate area of the airport with continuous light turbulence. Might not sound like much; but when it happens. It turns into a handful.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.