37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 1210966 |
Time | |
Date | 201410 |
Local Time Of Day | 1801-2400 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | ZZZ.Airport |
State Reference | US |
Environment | |
Flight Conditions | VMC |
Light | Dusk |
Aircraft 1 | |
Make Model Name | Amateur/Home Built/Experimental |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 91 |
Flight Phase | Cruise |
Route In Use | None |
Flight Plan | None |
Aircraft 2 | |
Make Model Name | Amateur/Home Built/Experimental |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 91 |
Flight Plan | VFR |
Person 1 | |
Function | Pilot Flying Single Pilot |
Qualification | Flight Crew Instrument Flight Crew Flight Instructor Flight Crew Flight Engineer Flight Crew Commercial |
Experience | Flight Crew Last 90 Days 35 Flight Crew Total 3350 Flight Crew Type 250 |
Person 2 | |
Function | Single Pilot Pilot Flying |
Qualification | Flight Crew Multiengine Flight Crew Air Transport Pilot (ATP) Flight Crew Instrument |
Experience | Flight Crew Last 90 Days 60 Flight Crew Total 6700 Flight Crew Type 115 |
Events | |
Anomaly | Airspace Violation All Types Deviation - Procedural FAR |
Narrative:
I was participating in a flight of vans rv series experimental aircraft for the purpose of conducting a pre-game flyover for [a] major league baseball game. The flight obtained a tfr waiver and received radar services from [the associated] approach control. The flight was conducted as briefed.the day after the flyover the team received information from [our association's] vice president of government relations; that he had been informed by the FAA department 800; washington dc; that the team would be violated for title 14 crash fire rescue equipment section 91.319 (c) for any future flyovers over the stadium. Unfortunately; this information was received the day after the flyover.although I believe the FAA interpretation of title 14 crash fire rescue equipment section 91.319(c) is incorrect and should be challenged through proper channels; I would not have participated in the flyover if I had been provided the FAA's current interpretation of the crash fire rescue equipment prior to the flyover.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: A day after having performed a previously approved stadium overflight demonstration with nine homebuilt aircraft the pilots received notice through a third party (an association officer) dated prior to the event advising any such flights would be in violation of CFR 91.319c.
Narrative: I was participating in a flight of Vans RV series experimental aircraft for the purpose of conducting a pre-game flyover for [a] Major League Baseball game. The flight obtained a TFR waiver and received radar services from [the associated] Approach Control. The flight was conducted as briefed.The day after the flyover the team received information from [our association's] Vice President of Government Relations; that he had been informed by the FAA Department 800; Washington DC; that the team would be violated for Title 14 CFR section 91.319 (c) for any future flyovers over the Stadium. Unfortunately; this information was received the day after the flyover.Although I believe the FAA interpretation of Title 14 CFR section 91.319(c) is incorrect and should be challenged through proper channels; I would not have participated in the flyover if I had been provided the FAA's current interpretation of the CFR prior to the flyover.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.