37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 1224766 |
Time | |
Date | 201412 |
Local Time Of Day | 1801-2400 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | S56.TRACON |
State Reference | UT |
Environment | |
Light | Night |
Aircraft 1 | |
Make Model Name | Helicopter |
Flight Phase | Cruise Climb |
Flight Plan | VFR |
Aircraft 2 | |
Make Model Name | Fighter |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 91 |
Flight Phase | Cruise Initial Climb |
Route In Use | Vectors |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Person 1 | |
Function | Approach |
Qualification | Air Traffic Control Developmental |
Events | |
Anomaly | ATC Issue All Types Conflict NMAC |
Narrative:
While working approach for the satellite airports; aircraft X had been released IFR with the previous controller. Several flights of fighters were inbound for their recoveries back to hif. I misjudged the climb rate characteristics for aircraft X and had anticipated them to climb at a faster rate than they did. They were assigned a vector to join the airway; climbing. Traffic was issued to aircraft Y; 4/fighters several times and also to aircraft X. The conflict alert did not go off. When the fighters were 4NM west; I answered another flight checking in instead of issuing a traffic alert. I felt the projected flight path of the fighters was behind that of aircraft X. However; after reviewing the tape I recognized that I did not see the wingman's primary target pass directly below aircraft X. At the crossing point; aircraft X was at 8100 feet and aircraft Y flight indicated 7600 feet. I do not know what altitude the wingman who passed below aircraft X was. The pilot of that aircraft called to report a near midair collision. Consider aircraft characteristics more appropriately. Maintain a more diligent scan.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: S56 controller reports of a NMAC caused by an un-anticipated climb rate of one aircraft and the possible altitude deviation of a flight of four aircraft.
Narrative: While working approach for the satellite airports; Aircraft X had been released IFR with the previous controller. Several flights of fighters were inbound for their recoveries back to HIF. I misjudged the climb rate characteristics for Aircraft X and had anticipated them to climb at a faster rate than they did. They were assigned a vector to join the airway; climbing. Traffic was issued to Aircraft Y; 4/fighters several times and also to Aircraft X. The conflict alert did not go off. When the fighters were 4NM west; I answered another flight checking in instead of issuing a traffic alert. I felt the projected flight path of the fighters was behind that of Aircraft X. However; after reviewing the tape I recognized that I did not see the wingman's primary target pass directly below Aircraft X. At the crossing point; Aircraft X was at 8100 feet and Aircraft Y flight indicated 7600 feet. I do not know what altitude the wingman who passed below Aircraft X was. The pilot of that aircraft called to report a NMAC. Consider aircraft characteristics more appropriately. Maintain a more diligent scan.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.