37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 1225707 |
Time | |
Date | 201412 |
Local Time Of Day | 0601-1200 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | FDK.Airport |
State Reference | MD |
Environment | |
Flight Conditions | VMC |
Light | Daylight |
Aircraft 1 | |
Make Model Name | Amateur/Home Built/Experimental |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 91 |
Flight Phase | Landing |
Route In Use | Visual Approach |
Flight Plan | None |
Aircraft 2 | |
Make Model Name | Socata (Aerospatiale) Undifferentiated or Other Model |
Flight Phase | Landing |
Person 1 | |
Function | Pilot Flying Single Pilot |
Qualification | Flight Crew Private |
Experience | Flight Crew Last 90 Days 20 Flight Crew Total 550 Flight Crew Type 50 |
Events | |
Anomaly | Conflict NMAC |
Miss Distance | Horizontal 600 Vertical 0 |
Narrative:
I was involved in a mid-air near miss on approach to runway 30 at frederick municipal airport in maryland. I was flying into my home base of frederick; md after a .5 hour sightseeing flight from the south west at about 2;500 MSL. I made a radio call to the tower prior to entering class D airspace with my position; altitude and intentions. I was instructed to call 3 miles advanced of a left downwind entry for 30. A few moments later; [another aircraft] called 8 miles south of the field inbound for landing. He received the same instruction I did (3 miles call prior to downwind entry to 30). I made my call as instructed and received 'not in sight; cleared to land.' the [other] pilot then called in 2 miles south; received a #2 for the runway and relayed that he did not have me in sight. I gave my position as on left downwind abeam the arrival end of runway 30. The pilot of the socata replied that he was 'searching'. It turns out; the [other] pilot was east of the field and was making a straight in approach for 30; and my turn from base to final approach put us on a collision course. The tower had the [other] pilot execute an evasive 360 turn to the right. He completed this turn in less than 40 seconds; rolled out of the turn on short final and I was then issued an expeditious runway exit instruction from the tower. I felt that the pilot's aggressive maneuvering; incorrect position reporting; and lack of judgment on entering a final approach vector as #2 with no visual contact with traffic ahead were contributing factors. My failure to identify the aircraft prior to the evasive instruction was also a contributing factor. Although I contacted the tower on my own accord after the event; I feel that this incident should have required a debrief for both pilots involved.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: A pilot reported a near mid air collision when another aircraft reported an incorrect location and failure by both pilots and ATC to identify the conflict.
Narrative: I was involved in a mid-air near miss on approach to Runway 30 at Frederick Municipal Airport in Maryland. I was flying into my home base of Frederick; MD after a .5 hour sightseeing flight from the South West at about 2;500 MSL. I made a radio call to the tower prior to entering class D airspace with my position; altitude and intentions. I was instructed to call 3 miles advanced of a left downwind entry for 30. A few moments later; [another aircraft] called 8 miles South of the field inbound for landing. He received the same instruction I did (3 miles call prior to downwind entry to 30). I made my call as instructed and received 'not in sight; cleared to land.' The [other] pilot then called in 2 miles south; received a #2 for the runway and relayed that he did not have me in sight. I gave my position as on left downwind abeam the arrival end of runway 30. The pilot of the Socata replied that he was 'searching'. It turns out; the [other] pilot was East of the field and was making a straight in approach for 30; and my turn from base to final approach put us on a collision course. The tower had the [other] pilot execute an evasive 360 turn to the right. He completed this turn in less than 40 seconds; rolled out of the turn on short final and I was then issued an expeditious runway exit instruction from the tower. I felt that the pilot's aggressive maneuvering; incorrect position reporting; and lack of judgment on entering a final approach vector as #2 with no visual contact with traffic ahead were contributing factors. My failure to identify the aircraft prior to the evasive instruction was also a contributing factor. Although I contacted the tower on my own accord after the event; I feel that this incident should have required a debrief for both pilots involved.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.