37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 122736 |
Time | |
Date | 198909 |
Day | Fri |
Local Time Of Day | 1201 To 1800 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | atc facility : sma |
State Reference | CA |
Altitude | msl bound lower : 3700 msl bound upper : 3700 |
Environment | |
Flight Conditions | VMC |
Light | Daylight |
Aircraft 1 | |
Controlling Facilities | tracon : bur |
Operator | general aviation : corporate |
Make Model Name | Small Transport, Low Wing, 2 Turboprop Eng |
Flight Phase | climbout : intermediate altitude climbout : takeoff cruise other |
Flight Plan | None |
Person 1 | |
Affiliation | Other |
Function | flight crew : single pilot |
Qualification | pilot : commercial pilot : instrument pilot : cfi |
Experience | flight time last 90 days : 75 flight time total : 8000 flight time type : 400 |
ASRS Report | 122736 |
Person 2 | |
Affiliation | government : faa |
Function | controller : approach |
Qualification | controller : radar |
Events | |
Anomaly | aircraft equipment problem : less severe other anomaly other |
Independent Detector | other controllera other flight crewa |
Resolutory Action | flight crew : overcame equipment problem |
Consequence | Other |
Supplementary | |
Primary Problem | Aircraft |
Air Traffic Incident | other |
Narrative:
I may have violated the 30 mi perimeter around the lax-TCA. In the aircraft described above, there are 2 xponders with mode C. In departing VFR from smo, #1 transponder was selected. After given permission to contact bur approach, I called, was given a code, but they could not identify me. In troubleshooting the problem, I selected the #2 transponder, which they (bur) received immediately. The #1 transponder was and still is operating normally. I don't know why it did not function for that instance. So, I may have flown in the 30 mi perimeter around the lax TCA west/O a visible 1200 squawk and mode C operating. I never entered the TCA itself, but due to the location of smo, was within the 30 mi. Problem: at many airports you can see an operating reply light on the ground prior to takeoff as a confirmation of an operating transponder. At smo, I did not notice the light. So, it becomes possible to fly in the 30 mi perimeter west/O a transponder and mode C, and not know if until after takeoff. I don't know how the new regulation would apply to this situation.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: #1 TRANSPONDER MOMENTARILY FAILED IN FLT WITHIN THE 30 MILE VEIL OF TCA. USED SECOND TRANSPONDER.
Narrative: I MAY HAVE VIOLATED THE 30 MI PERIMETER AROUND THE LAX-TCA. IN THE ACFT DESCRIBED ABOVE, THERE ARE 2 XPONDERS WITH MODE C. IN DEPARTING VFR FROM SMO, #1 XPONDER WAS SELECTED. AFTER GIVEN PERMISSION TO CONTACT BUR APCH, I CALLED, WAS GIVEN A CODE, BUT THEY COULD NOT IDENT ME. IN TROUBLESHOOTING THE PROB, I SELECTED THE #2 XPONDER, WHICH THEY (BUR) RECEIVED IMMEDIATELY. THE #1 XPONDER WAS AND STILL IS OPERATING NORMALLY. I DON'T KNOW WHY IT DID NOT FUNCTION FOR THAT INSTANCE. SO, I MAY HAVE FLOWN IN THE 30 MI PERIMETER AROUND THE LAX TCA W/O A VISIBLE 1200 SQUAWK AND MODE C OPERATING. I NEVER ENTERED THE TCA ITSELF, BUT DUE TO THE LOCATION OF SMO, WAS WITHIN THE 30 MI. PROB: AT MANY ARPTS YOU CAN SEE AN OPERATING REPLY LIGHT ON THE GND PRIOR TO TKOF AS A CONFIRMATION OF AN OPERATING XPONDER. AT SMO, I DID NOT NOTICE THE LIGHT. SO, IT BECOMES POSSIBLE TO FLY IN THE 30 MI PERIMETER W/O A XPONDER AND MODE C, AND NOT KNOW IF UNTIL AFTER TKOF. I DON'T KNOW HOW THE NEW REG WOULD APPLY TO THIS SITUATION.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of August 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.