37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 1236230 |
Time | |
Date | 201501 |
Local Time Of Day | 1201-1800 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | LAX.Airport |
State Reference | CA |
Environment | |
Flight Conditions | VMC |
Aircraft 1 | |
Make Model Name | B737 Undifferentiated or Other Model |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 121 |
Flight Phase | Descent Initial Approach |
Route In Use | STAR RIIVR TWO |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Person 1 | |
Function | Pilot Flying First Officer |
Experience | Flight Crew Last 90 Days 118 Flight Crew Type 1740 |
Events | |
Anomaly | No Specific Anomaly Occurred All Types |
Narrative:
While accomplishing the RIIVR2 arrival to lax we were given the ILS runway 25L. Approximately 5 miles prior to the riivr fix (common to both runway 25L and 24R) we were told to utilize runway 24R.approach control had us fly a speed higher than recommended by the FMS and they started our descent on the arrival later than optimum. When the change to runway 24R was given to us; we had little time to enter it into the FMS; reduce our speed and return to a normal vertical profile. We were able to safely accomplish everything to get the aircraft in a position to land and meet the stabilized approach criteria but not without significant effort and much 'heads down' time close to the airport in a high traffic area. It is not uncommon to be kept high and fast and given last minute runway changes at lax. I believe our combined flight experience and good CRM were critical to a safe outcome. Had there been marginal weather or an inexperienced crew; there is a high potential for task saturation close to the ground; at a very busy airport; with a different outcome.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: A B737 flight crew landing at LAX was issued a late runway change. They were 'heads down' for significant amount of time in a highly congested traffic area but were able to comply with the instructions and land safely.
Narrative: While accomplishing the RIIVR2 arrival to LAX we were given the ILS RWY 25L. Approximately 5 miles prior to the RIIVR fix (common to both RWY 25L and 24R) we were told to utilize RWY 24R.Approach Control had us fly a speed higher than recommended by the FMS and they started our descent on the arrival later than optimum. When the change to runway 24R was given to us; we had little time to enter it into the FMS; reduce our speed and return to a normal vertical profile. We were able to safely accomplish everything to get the aircraft in a position to land and meet the stabilized approach criteria but not without significant effort and much 'heads down' time close to the airport in a high traffic area. It is not uncommon to be kept high and fast and given last minute runway changes at LAX. I believe our combined flight experience and good CRM were critical to a safe outcome. Had there been marginal weather or an inexperienced crew; there is a high potential for task saturation close to the ground; at a very busy airport; with a different outcome.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.