37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 1239379 |
Time | |
Date | 201502 |
Local Time Of Day | 0001-0600 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | ZID.ARTCC |
State Reference | IN |
Environment | |
Flight Conditions | VMC |
Light | Daylight |
Aircraft 1 | |
Make Model Name | Regional Jet 700 ER/LR (CRJ700) |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 121 |
Flight Phase | Climb |
Route In Use | SID OOM2 |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Person 1 | |
Function | Pilot Flying First Officer |
Person 2 | |
Function | Pilot Not Flying Captain |
Events | |
Anomaly | Deviation - Procedural Clearance Deviation - Procedural Published Material / Policy Deviation - Track / Heading All Types |
Narrative:
Pre departure clearance stated: -OOM2 pxv-FMS route installed: OOM2; pxv as filedon the departure on the OOM2; ATC asked if we were 'direct pxv?' we responded affirmative OOM2 'direct pxv'.memphis center later on gave us a number to call ind center to once we landed.the cause of the error on the routing in our FMS came from the translation and duplication of what was on the pre departure clearance which was verified by both pilots. The pre departure clearance was understood and viewed as OOM2 direct pxv.it would be nice in the future if the pre departure clearance was more explicit rather than vague and showed that V305 needed to be flown in between the SID identifer and the next fix shown. It is not as straight forward as it could be.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: A CRJ7 crew given a PDC clearance of OOM2 PXV.. fly direct PXV after OOM thus missing the WEGEE FIX. Crew is requested to call ZID on arrival in which ATC asks why they deviated from the SID route to PXV.
Narrative: PDC stated: -OOM2 PXV-FMS route installed: OOM2; PXV as filedOn the departure on the OOM2; ATC asked if we were 'direct PXV?' We responded affirmative OOM2 'direct PXV'.Memphis Center later on gave us a number to call IND Center to once we landed.The cause of the error on the routing in our FMS came from the translation and duplication of what was on the PDC which was verified by both pilots. The PDC was understood and viewed as OOM2 direct PXV.It would be nice in the future if the PDC was more explicit rather than vague and showed that V305 needed to be flown in between the SID identifer and the next fix shown. It is not as straight forward as it could be.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.