Narrative:

On arrival to apa I was on radar vectors and descended down to 9000 feet. I was advised that there would be light mixed ice below 9000 feet. After 10 minutes or so of being vectored in the ice (temp was -10 and picking up moderate mixed) I was vectored for the final approach course between firpi and casse on the ILS to runway 35. Upon receiving clearance for the approach to maintain 8000 feet till established; I proceeded to intercept the localizer. I noticed an intermittent localizer but proceeded to intercept. I flew through the course by not much when the needle came alive. Once turned back to intercept; ATC advised that it appears that you have flown thru the localizer. I concurred and indicated a live needle. I was still getting errors in indication and both the localizer and glide slope came in and out. Still outside of casse; I reported intermittent signal to ATC with the mental plan of going missed once inside of the FAF. I was told to report to tower. Approaching the FAF I noted a glide slope indication suggesting I was high. I began to descend. Moments later; I looked down on the approach plate; confirmed my location (outside of casse) and concluded I was receiving an error indication and proceeded to climb and maintain 8000 feet as cleared. At that moment; ATC transmitted; 'I'm receiving a low altitude warning.' I responded; 'correcting'. I was then reminded to maintain 8000 feet till established. Upon reaching casse; I proceeded inbound with positive indication. Interesting to note that upon reporting the intermittent indications; the aircraft ahead on the same approach confirmed the error sensing and gave a positive pilot report. I proceeded inbound with little trouble thereafter with the runway in sight at 6950 MSL. Upon landing; I noted excessive ice accumulation on the aircraft surfaces and antennas in the amount of >1.5 inches and upwards to 2 inches in places. It is my belief that the errors were the result of interference with the antenna signals for both aircraft. Not certain...could have also been a weak signal.

Google
 

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: A King Air B100 pilot reported getting low on the ILS to APA airport while flying in icing conditions and experienced erratic localizer and glideslope signals; possibly related to ice accumulation.

Narrative: On arrival to APA I was on radar vectors and descended down to 9000 feet. I was advised that there would be light mixed ice below 9000 feet. After 10 minutes or so of being vectored in the ice (temp was -10 and picking up moderate mixed) I was vectored for the final approach course between FIRPI and CASSE on the ILS to RWY 35. Upon receiving clearance for the approach to maintain 8000 feet till established; I proceeded to intercept the localizer. I noticed an intermittent localizer but proceeded to intercept. I flew through the course by not much when the needle came alive. Once turned back to intercept; ATC advised that it appears that you have flown thru the localizer. I concurred and indicated a live needle. I was still getting errors in indication and both the localizer and glide slope came in and out. Still outside of CASSE; I reported intermittent signal to ATC with the mental plan of going missed once inside of the FAF. I was told to report to tower. Approaching the FAF I noted a glide slope indication suggesting I was high. I began to descend. Moments later; I looked down on the approach plate; confirmed my location (outside of CASSE) and concluded I was receiving an error indication and proceeded to climb and maintain 8000 feet as cleared. At that moment; ATC transmitted; 'I'm receiving a low altitude warning.' I responded; 'correcting'. I was then reminded to maintain 8000 feet till established. Upon reaching CASSE; I proceeded inbound with positive indication. Interesting to note that upon reporting the intermittent indications; the aircraft ahead on the same approach confirmed the error sensing and gave a positive pilot report. I proceeded inbound with little trouble thereafter with the RWY in sight at 6950 MSL. Upon landing; I noted excessive ice accumulation on the aircraft surfaces and antennas in the amount of >1.5 inches and upwards to 2 inches in places. It is my belief that the errors were the result of interference with the antenna signals for both aircraft. Not certain...could have also been a weak signal.

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.