37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 124964 |
Time | |
Date | 198910 |
Day | Tue |
Local Time Of Day | 0601 To 1200 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | airport : sln |
State Reference | KS |
Altitude | msl bound lower : 1300 msl bound upper : 1300 |
Environment | |
Flight Conditions | VMC |
Light | Daylight |
Aircraft 1 | |
Controlling Facilities | tower : sln |
Operator | other |
Make Model Name | Fighter |
Flight Phase | landing other |
Flight Plan | VFR |
Aircraft 2 | |
Operator | other |
Make Model Name | Helicopter |
Flight Phase | other |
Flight Plan | None |
Person 1 | |
Affiliation | government : faa |
Function | controller : local |
Qualification | controller : non radar |
ASRS Report | 124964 |
Person 2 | |
Affiliation | government : military |
Function | flight crew : single pilot |
Qualification | pilot : military |
Events | |
Anomaly | conflict : nmac non adherence : far other anomaly other |
Independent Detector | other controllera other flight crewa |
Resolutory Action | none taken : anomaly accepted |
Consequence | Other |
Miss Distance | horizontal : 0 vertical : 200 |
Supplementary | |
Primary Problem | ATC Human Performance |
Air Traffic Incident | Operational Deviation |
Narrative:
2 fgt's reported 5 mi final for runway 17 on a 'straight in simulated flame out'. I was controling a helicopter hovering over the sod area east of the approach end of runway 17. (Several aircraft had previously landed and traffic had been issued with no problem.) as the fgt's were cleared for 'the option' I checked to make sure a previous arrival was clearing the runway. I did not tell the fgt's about the helicopter hovering east, off the runway. Fgt 1 did low approach over runway 17 while fgt 2 (wing man) offset the runway and flew just over the top of the helicopter. From the tower I could not see that the second fgt was offset. It was too close for comfort for all concerned. For years I have worked military aircraft, but I never knew that they offset the runway unless it had been coordinated. I'll be very careful to issue traffic under such circumstances in the future, no matter how busy I am.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: FGT CAME IN CLOSE PROX TO A HELICOPTER HOVERING NEAR THE RWY.
Narrative: 2 FGT'S REPORTED 5 MI FINAL FOR RWY 17 ON A 'STRAIGHT IN SIMULATED FLAME OUT'. I WAS CTLING A HELI HOVERING OVER THE SOD AREA E OF THE APCH END OF RWY 17. (SEVERAL ACFT HAD PREVIOUSLY LANDED AND TFC HAD BEEN ISSUED WITH NO PROBLEM.) AS THE FGT'S WERE CLRED FOR 'THE OPTION' I CHECKED TO MAKE SURE A PREVIOUS ARR WAS CLEARING THE RWY. I DID NOT TELL THE FGT'S ABOUT THE HELI HOVERING E, OFF THE RWY. FGT 1 DID LOW APCH OVER RWY 17 WHILE FGT 2 (WING MAN) OFFSET THE RWY AND FLEW JUST OVER THE TOP OF THE HELI. FROM THE TWR I COULD NOT SEE THAT THE SECOND FGT WAS OFFSET. IT WAS TOO CLOSE FOR COMFORT FOR ALL CONCERNED. FOR YEARS I HAVE WORKED MIL ACFT, BUT I NEVER KNEW THAT THEY OFFSET THE RWY UNLESS IT HAD BEEN COORDINATED. I'LL BE VERY CAREFUL TO ISSUE TFC UNDER SUCH CIRCUMSTANCES IN THE FUTURE, NO MATTER HOW BUSY I AM.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of August 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.