37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 1253009 |
Time | |
Date | 201504 |
Local Time Of Day | 0601-1200 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | TRI.Airport |
State Reference | TN |
Environment | |
Light | Daylight |
Aircraft 1 | |
Make Model Name | Medium Transport |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 121 |
Flight Phase | Final Approach Landing |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Person 1 | |
Function | First Officer Pilot Not Flying |
Qualification | Flight Crew Air Transport Pilot (ATP) |
Person 2 | |
Function | Pilot Flying Captain |
Qualification | Flight Crew Air Transport Pilot (ATP) |
Events | |
Anomaly | Deviation - Procedural Published Material / Policy Deviation - Speed All Types Inflight Event / Encounter Unstabilized Approach |
Narrative:
While completing a monitored CAT ii approach; we broke out at approximately 150 feet above min. Controls were transferred at which point the autopilot was also disconnected by the captain. Visibility was very good. I transitioned my vision outside to monitor the visual approach and noticed we were pitching down. From my point of view I assumed we were maneuvering to maximize full length of runway 28. As a result we received a sink rate GPWS. The captain over corrected slightly; at which point we received the stick shaker. At the stick shaker; the captain momentarily increased thrust to go-around power and back to idle. We landed in the touchdown zone.at the point the decision to go around was made by the captain; I should not have hesitated to continue with the decision.go around at any time during the approach in which continuing might end in an undesired outcome!
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: Air carrier flight crew reported getting a stick shaker at low altitude on a monitored Cat II Approach. Captain chose to continue to an uneventful landing.
Narrative: While completing a monitored CAT II approach; we broke out at approximately 150 feet above min. Controls were transferred at which point the autopilot was also disconnected by the Captain. Visibility was very good. I transitioned my vision outside to monitor the visual approach and noticed we were pitching down. From my point of view I assumed we were maneuvering to maximize full length of runway 28. As a result we received a sink rate GPWS. The captain over corrected slightly; at which point we received the stick shaker. At the stick shaker; the captain momentarily increased thrust to go-around power and back to idle. We landed in the touchdown zone.At the point the decision to go around was made by the captain; I should not have hesitated to continue with the decision.Go Around at any time during the approach in which continuing might end in an undesired outcome!
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.