37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 1253622 |
Time | |
Date | 201504 |
Local Time Of Day | 0601-1200 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | ZZZ.Airport |
State Reference | US |
Environment | |
Flight Conditions | IMC |
Light | Daylight |
Aircraft 1 | |
Make Model Name | A321 |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 121 |
Flight Phase | Initial Approach |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Component | |
Aircraft Component | Powerplant Fuel Control Unit |
Person 1 | |
Function | First Officer Pilot Flying |
Qualification | Flight Crew Air Transport Pilot (ATP) |
Person 2 | |
Function | Pilot Not Flying Check Pilot Captain |
Qualification | Flight Crew Air Transport Pilot (ATP) |
Events | |
Anomaly | Aircraft Equipment Problem Critical |
Narrative:
Outside the OM for the ILS; ECAM advised engine 2 fuel control fault. Almost immediately after; ECAM advised engine 2 fail followed by complete loss of thrust. ECAM then advised facility 2 fail and engine 2 start valve (fault?) we aborted the approach; remained at 3;000 feet and [notified ATC] and requested a pattern back to the ILS to provide time for ECAM and QRH actions and follow up. I was pilot flying and remained so initially; captain followed [the] non-normal methodology; had me continue to fly while he accomplished non-normal procedures. After all ECAM; QRH and follow up actions were complete; including notification of ATC; flight attendants and operations he took over duties of pilot flying for the single engine landing.initial evaluation by maintenance personnel indicated a fuel control failure; loss of fuel feed to the engine causing the rollback and loss of thrust. I would like to say that as a new hire (on IOE during this event) that the initial airbus training program is excellent. Every initial instructor; ground school instructor; simulator instructor/evaluator; and the IOE captains were wonderful to work with; expert in their areas; professional and personable.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: A321 flight crew experiences an engine failure at 3;000 feet during approach and elects to go-around to perform ECAM actions and QRH procedures. The Captain takes control of the aircraft for the single engine approach and landing. ECAM had annunciated 'ENG 2 FUEL CTL FAULT'; just before the engine rolled back.
Narrative: Outside the OM for the ILS; ECAM advised ENG 2 FUEL CTL FAULT. Almost immediately after; ECAM advised ENG 2 FAIL followed by complete loss of thrust. ECAM then advised FAC 2 FAIL and ENG 2 START VALVE (FAULT?) We aborted the approach; remained at 3;000 feet and [notified ATC] and requested a pattern back to the ILS to provide time for ECAM and QRH actions and follow up. I was pilot flying and remained so initially; Captain followed [the] non-normal methodology; had me continue to fly while he accomplished non-normal procedures. After all ECAM; QRH and follow up actions were complete; including notification of ATC; flight attendants and operations he took over duties of pilot flying for the single engine landing.Initial evaluation by maintenance personnel indicated a fuel control failure; loss of fuel feed to the engine causing the rollback and loss of thrust. I would like to say that as a new hire (on IOE during this event) that the initial Airbus training program is excellent. Every initial instructor; ground school instructor; simulator instructor/evaluator; and the IOE captains were wonderful to work with; expert in their areas; professional and personable.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.