A corporate aircraft departed fok IFR and had near miss below 1;500 feet with a glider and tow aircr...

Narrative:

Our departure clearance was climb on runway heading to 2;000 feet. Before lining up I noted and verbalized to pilot flying (PF) of glider tow traffic to the west of the runway departure end; but didn't think it was an issue since it was so close in to the airport and ATC was talking to multiple aircraft in the vicinity. They didn't appear to be moving into our departure path.after departure and on initial climb out I noticed a TCAS target plus 4 (400 above) approx 2-3 miles ahead of us. I zoomed in on my display (during high workload time; nonetheless) to see it was actually less than a mile in front of us; and rapidly converging on our position. I looked out of the window and saw a glider in tow immediately on a collision course. The glider released and turned directly toward us. I believe the PF's head was down and I called out 'traffic - push down. Push down; turn right' and proceeded to grab the controls and keep saying this while helping him maneuver. He acquired the glider and we aggressively maneuvered to avoid a collision. No RA was given since we were close to the ground.this happened while simultaneously being handed off to ny [center]. I advised them of our maneuver for a near-miss with a glider. Had we not taken evasive action we might have collided with the glider and/or the tow plane. I believe we could have queried about the traffic before departing to be sure; but some time had passed since us seeing that traffic and being cleared for take-off. We didn't see any traffic immediately before being cleared for takeoff. I believe ATC may have made an error in clearing us for departure - it should have been delayed to avoid this close-in traffic. It was a nice day and lots of GA activity was happening on the airport. I believe we could have more aggressively maneuvered or maneuvered sooner when seeing the TCAS target. It was a high workload time but collision avoidance and flying should have taken precedence over all else when seeing an airplane on a converging flight path. In the future I will not hesitate to speak up and ask about potential conflicts instead of just assuming ATC has handled it.

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: A Corporate aircraft departed FOK IFR and had near miss below 1;500 feet with a glider and tow aircraft off the runway end with Class D airspace in operation.

Narrative: Our departure clearance was climb on runway heading to 2;000 feet. Before lining up I noted and verbalized to Pilot Flying (PF) of glider tow traffic to the west of the runway departure end; but didn't think it was an issue since it was so close in to the airport and ATC was talking to multiple aircraft in the vicinity. They didn't appear to be moving into our departure path.After departure and on initial climb out I noticed a TCAS target plus 4 (400 above) approx 2-3 miles ahead of us. I zoomed in on my display (during high workload time; nonetheless) to see it was actually less than a mile in front of us; and rapidly converging on our position. I looked out of the window and saw a glider in tow immediately on a collision course. The glider released and turned directly toward us. I believe the PF's head was down and I called out 'traffic - push down. Push down; turn right' and proceeded to grab the controls and keep saying this while helping him maneuver. He acquired the glider and we aggressively maneuvered to avoid a collision. No RA was given since we were close to the ground.This happened while simultaneously being handed off to NY [Center]. I advised them of our maneuver for a near-miss with a glider. Had we not taken evasive action we might have collided with the glider and/or the tow plane. I believe we could have queried about the traffic before departing to be sure; but some time had passed since us seeing that traffic and being cleared for take-off. We didn't see any traffic immediately before being cleared for takeoff. I believe ATC may have made an error in clearing us for departure - it should have been delayed to avoid this close-in traffic. It was a nice day and lots of GA activity was happening on the airport. I believe we could have more aggressively maneuvered or maneuvered sooner when seeing the TCAS target. It was a high workload time but collision avoidance and flying should have taken precedence over all else when seeing an airplane on a converging flight path. In the future I will not hesitate to speak up and ask about potential conflicts instead of just assuming ATC has handled it.

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.

Attributes
ACN	1278449
Time
Date	201507
Local Time Of Day	1201-1800
Place
Locale Reference	FOK.Airport
State Reference	NY
Environment
Flight Conditions	VMC
Light	Daylight
Aircraft 1
Make Model Name	Medium Transport Low Wing 2 Turbojet Eng
Operating Under FAR Part	Part 91
Flight Phase	Initial Climb
Route In Use	Vectors
Flight Plan	IFR
Aircraft 2
Make Model Name	Sail Plane
Operating Under FAR Part	Part 91
Flight Phase	Climb
Route In Use	None
Person 1
Function	Pilot Not Flying First Officer
Qualification	Flight Crew Multiengine Flight Crew Air Transport Pilot (ATP) Flight Crew Flight Instructor Flight Crew Instrument
Experience	Flight Crew Last 90 Days 75 Flight Crew Total 2200 Flight Crew Type 250
Events
Anomaly	ATC Issue All Types Conflict NMAC Deviation - Altitude Excursion From Assigned Altitude Deviation - Altitude Undershoot Deviation - Track / Heading All Types
Miss Distance	Horizontal 100 Vertical 0

A corporate aircraft departed fok IFR and had near miss below 1;500 feet with a glider and tow aircraft off the runway end with class D airspace in operation.