37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 1283405 |
Time | |
Date | 201508 |
Local Time Of Day | 1201-1800 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | RSW.Tower |
State Reference | FL |
Aircraft 1 | |
Make Model Name | PC-12 |
Flight Phase | Final Approach |
Route In Use | Visual Approach |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Aircraft 2 | |
Make Model Name | EMB ERJ 170/175 ER/LR |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 121 |
Flight Phase | Final Approach |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Person 1 | |
Function | Instructor |
Qualification | Air Traffic Control Fully Certified |
Experience | Air Traffic Control Time Certified In Pos 1 (yrs) 1.5 |
Events | |
Anomaly | ATC Issue All Types Conflict Airborne Conflict Deviation - Procedural Published Material / Policy Deviation - Procedural Clearance Deviation - Speed All Types |
Narrative:
I was training in the tower all positions combined. The workload was moderate with light difficulty. We were advertising ILS runway 6 due to haze in the area. Aircraft Y checked on and was cleared to land. Then aircraft X checks on and my trainee cleared him to land. I prompted him to issue a wake turbulence advisory. Aircraft X was 4 miles in trail when he checked on with an 80 KT overtake. I was training so my view of the data tag was not clear as they overlapped. My trainee issued the cautionary advisory. I believed there was a va in the y scratchpad. The aircraft Y landed as the aircraft X was on roughly a 3 mile final. I was scanning the ground traffic; when I looked up and aircraft X was on a 1/2 mile final and I did not observe the va in the y scratchpad. We were essentially handed a compression error immediately; and my failure to read the full data tag led to us not taking care of the issue appropriately. By the time I had realized and the phase of flight the aircraft X was in I felt it safer they land instead of sending them around.I discussed with my trainee we cannot provide visual separation in instances of wake turbulence. He said he had them in sight; however this does not matter. My trainee has 6 years of experience working in a VFR tower so I assumed he knew this rule. He said he observed nothing in the scratchpad but thought he was providing legal separation. In the future I will acquire all necessary data from the tag and pay closer attention to the tag to make sure the separation we are using is legal and take action accordingly. I discussed these 'outs' with my trainee. Call the traffic to the trailing aircraft and have them provide visual; or send them around if a 'va' is not observed in the scratchpad. I will verify all information for myself instead of assuming anything; including my trainee knowing the rules.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: RSW Instructing Controller reported a loss of separation due to the following aircraft being faster and the lack of visual separation. Wake turbulence was involved and though they could provide visual separation; it is not allowed in this instance. Instructor could not read data tag due to overlapping of tags and did not move the tags to determine if visual separation was being used correctly.
Narrative: I was training in the tower all positions combined. The workload was moderate with light difficulty. We were advertising ILS Runway 6 due to haze in the area. Aircraft Y checked on and was cleared to land. Then Aircraft X checks on and my trainee cleared him to land. I prompted him to issue a wake turbulence advisory. Aircraft X was 4 miles in trail when he checked on with an 80 KT overtake. I was training so my view of the data tag was not clear as they overlapped. My trainee issued the cautionary advisory. I believed there was a VA in the y scratchpad. The Aircraft Y landed as the Aircraft X was on roughly a 3 mile final. I was scanning the ground traffic; when I looked up and Aircraft X was on a 1/2 mile final and I did not observe the VA in the y scratchpad. We were essentially handed a compression error immediately; and my failure to read the full data tag led to us not taking care of the issue appropriately. By the time I had realized and the phase of flight the Aircraft X was in I felt it safer they land instead of sending them around.I discussed with my trainee we cannot provide visual separation in instances of wake turbulence. He said he had them in sight; however this does not matter. My trainee has 6 years of experience working in a VFR tower so I assumed he knew this rule. He said he observed nothing in the scratchpad but thought he was providing legal separation. In the future I will acquire all necessary data from the tag and pay closer attention to the tag to make sure the separation we are using is legal and take action accordingly. I discussed these 'outs' with my trainee. Call the traffic to the trailing aircraft and have them provide visual; or send them around if a 'VA' is not observed in the scratchpad. I will verify all information for myself instead of assuming anything; including my trainee knowing the rules.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.