37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 1286665 |
Time | |
Date | 201508 |
Local Time Of Day | 1801-2400 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | SCT.TRACON |
State Reference | CA |
Environment | |
Flight Conditions | VMC |
Light | Daylight |
Aircraft 1 | |
Make Model Name | Widebody Low Wing 2 Turbojet Eng |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 121 |
Flight Phase | Climb Initial Climb |
Route In Use | SID LOOP7 |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Aircraft 2 | |
Make Model Name | Medium Large Transport Low Wing 2 Turbojet Eng |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 121 |
Flight Phase | Climb Initial Climb |
Route In Use | Vectors SID LAXX7 |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Person 1 | |
Function | Departure |
Qualification | Air Traffic Control Fully Certified |
Experience | Air Traffic Control Radar 13 Air Traffic Control Time Certified In Pos 1 (mon) 8 |
Person 2 | |
Function | Captain Pilot Not Flying |
Qualification | Flight Crew Air Transport Pilot (ATP) |
Events | |
Anomaly | ATC Issue All Types Conflict Airborne Conflict Deviation - Procedural Clearance Deviation - Procedural Published Material / Policy |
Narrative:
Aircraft X departed lax on the loop departure. I climbed them to 13;000 ft and placed them in handoff to ZLA. Aircraft Y departed lax on the laxx departure and I instructed them to maintain 250 knots. Aircraft Y did not check in climbing to a certain altitude and I did not issue them one. They should have been climbing to 5000 ft as issued by lax tower. Aircraft X was issued a left turn to lax VOR to rejoin the loop SID and a climb to 15000 ft. Aircraft Y was issued a 160 heading to place them in compliance with my handoff to the next controller. I gave a few other control instructions and then noticed aircraft Y climbing through 6400 ft. I instructed aircraft Y to maintain 7000 ft and issued the traffic on aircraft X; who was climbing out of 7500 ft. Aircraft Y reported they were leveling and responding to an RA. Aircraft X then reported responding to an RA. Aircraft Y came back and reported aircraft X in sight and I questioned what altitude they were climbing to. They responded with 11 thousand via the departure.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: An air carrier flight crew and SCT Controller reported an airborne conflict between the flight crew's aircraft and another air carrier flight. Contributing factors included a misread PDC by the flight crew and improper altitude reporting during initial contact with SCT. Frequency congestion likely contributed.
Narrative: Aircraft X departed LAX on the LOOP departure. I climbed them to 13;000 ft and placed them in handoff to ZLA. Aircraft Y departed LAX on the LAXX departure and I instructed them to maintain 250 knots. Aircraft Y did not check in climbing to a certain altitude and I did not issue them one. They should have been climbing to 5000 ft as issued by LAX tower. Aircraft X was issued a left turn to LAX VOR to rejoin the LOOP SID and a climb to 15000 ft. Aircraft Y was issued a 160 heading to place them in compliance with my handoff to the next controller. I gave a few other control instructions and then noticed Aircraft Y climbing through 6400 ft. I instructed Aircraft Y to maintain 7000 ft and issued the traffic on Aircraft X; who was climbing out of 7500 ft. Aircraft Y reported they were leveling and responding to an RA. Aircraft X then reported responding to an RA. Aircraft Y came back and reported Aircraft X in sight and I questioned what altitude they were climbing to. They responded with 11 thousand via the departure.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.