37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 1305268 |
Time | |
Date | 201510 |
Local Time Of Day | 0601-1200 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | ZZZ.Airport |
State Reference | US |
Environment | |
Flight Conditions | IMC |
Light | Daylight |
Aircraft 1 | |
Make Model Name | Cessna Citation Sovereign (C680) |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 91 |
Flight Phase | Descent |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Component | |
Aircraft Component | Pitot-Static System |
Person 1 | |
Function | Captain Pilot Not Flying |
Qualification | Flight Crew Air Transport Pilot (ATP) |
Events | |
Anomaly | Aircraft Equipment Problem Critical Inflight Event / Encounter Unstabilized Approach Inflight Event / Encounter Weather / Turbulence |
Narrative:
During descent into our destination the airspeed indicators showed a difference of more than 25 knots. The autopilot failed. Engine control faults were cycling. The anti-ice had been on for a minimum of 15 minutes before entering into the precipitation. Due to conflicting airspeed indications and altitude indications; the first attempt at a landing was abandoned by me calling go around; as we were not established and stable. The second attempt was successful; but we lost communications with ATC due to the radio interference from the weather. I believe that this was a circumstantial event; and that maintenance was a large factor; but earlier recognition of the flights disparities would have eased the situation.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: A C-680 on descent in heavy precipitation developed a 25 knot airspeed discrepancy along with autopilot and engine control malfunctions. A go-around was executed from an unstabilized approach with airspeed and altitude discrepancies.
Narrative: During descent into our destination the airspeed indicators showed a difference of more than 25 knots. The Autopilot failed. Engine control faults were cycling. The anti-ice had been on for a minimum of 15 minutes before entering into the precipitation. Due to conflicting airspeed indications and altitude indications; the first attempt at a landing was abandoned by me calling go around; as we were not established and stable. The second attempt was successful; but we lost communications with ATC due to the radio interference from the weather. I believe that this was a circumstantial event; and that maintenance was a large factor; but earlier recognition of the flights disparities would have eased the situation.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.