37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 131821 |
Time | |
Date | 198912 |
Day | Tue |
Local Time Of Day | 1201 To 1800 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | airport : mic |
State Reference | MN |
Altitude | msl bound lower : 1500 msl bound upper : 2500 |
Environment | |
Flight Conditions | Mixed |
Light | Daylight |
Aircraft 1 | |
Controlling Facilities | tracon : msp |
Operator | general aviation : personal |
Make Model Name | Small Transport, Low Wing, 2 Recip Eng |
Flight Phase | descent : approach descent other |
Route In Use | enroute : on vectors |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Person 1 | |
Affiliation | Other |
Function | flight crew : single pilot |
Qualification | pilot : instrument pilot : private |
Experience | flight time last 90 days : 50 flight time total : 650 flight time type : 40 |
ASRS Report | 131821 |
Events | |
Anomaly | altitude deviation : excursion from assigned altitude non adherence : clearance non adherence : published procedure |
Independent Detector | other flight crewa |
Resolutory Action | none taken : anomaly accepted |
Consequence | Other |
Supplementary | |
Primary Problem | Flight Crew Human Performance |
Air Traffic Incident | Pilot Deviation |
Narrative:
Handing off from msp center for voa-a approach, I was turned inbound right outside the VOR at 2500'. My primary concern at the time was the 3400' of icy, snow-covered runways, flying a twin in there for the first time. I was concerned with the VOR approach and only having 4 1/2 mi to the threshold that I would not get the aircraft slowed down enough and in time for the landing. As a result, I began descent to MDA before rather than after the VOR, which resulted in crossing the VOR at 1500', not 2500' as shown on plate profile. The change in frequency just prior added to the confusion. Contributing factors: 1) 2 tired toddlers in the back seat. 2) complacency--had flown same approach to minimums several times before in the single, but let the change in having a twin overshadow the set procedures. 3) being VMC, I was in paying less attention to the procedures than I should have. I was thinking too far ahead of the plane in that I was thinking about landing before I was close to getting there. In summary, if you're on an IFR, stay IFR (on the procedures) until you cancel it!
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: GA SMA ALT DEVIATION EXCURSION FROM CLRNC ALT DURING IAP VOR APCH.
Narrative: HANDING OFF FROM MSP CENTER FOR VOA-A APCH, I WAS TURNED INBND RIGHT OUTSIDE THE VOR AT 2500'. MY PRIMARY CONCERN AT THE TIME WAS THE 3400' OF ICY, SNOW-COVERED RWYS, FLYING A TWIN IN THERE FOR THE FIRST TIME. I WAS CONCERNED WITH THE VOR APCH AND ONLY HAVING 4 1/2 MI TO THE THRESHOLD THAT I WOULD NOT GET THE ACFT SLOWED DOWN ENOUGH AND IN TIME FOR THE LNDG. AS A RESULT, I BEGAN DSCNT TO MDA BEFORE RATHER THAN AFTER THE VOR, WHICH RESULTED IN XING THE VOR AT 1500', NOT 2500' AS SHOWN ON PLATE PROFILE. THE CHANGE IN FREQ JUST PRIOR ADDED TO THE CONFUSION. CONTRIBUTING FACTORS: 1) 2 TIRED TODDLERS IN THE BACK SEAT. 2) COMPLACENCY--HAD FLOWN SAME APCH TO MINIMUMS SEVERAL TIMES BEFORE IN THE SINGLE, BUT LET THE CHANGE IN HAVING A TWIN OVERSHADOW THE SET PROCS. 3) BEING VMC, I WAS IN PAYING LESS ATTN TO THE PROCS THAN I SHOULD HAVE. I WAS THINKING TOO FAR AHEAD OF THE PLANE IN THAT I WAS THINKING ABOUT LNDG BEFORE I WAS CLOSE TO GETTING THERE. IN SUMMARY, IF YOU'RE ON AN IFR, STAY IFR (ON THE PROCS) UNTIL YOU CANCEL IT!
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of August 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.