Narrative:

We [worked] another late night and flight across the country. During our pre-flight planning; we checked all pertinent information of the flight; including all notams at sfo.we were told to descend via the DYAMD2 arrival into sfo. They were a little late issuing this instruction; which caused a steeper than normal descent. We notified them it would be hard to cross laane at FL260. ATC waved the restriction at laane and told us to make the crossing restriction at flowz. The rest of the arrival was very busy; as we were being vectored quite a bit. The deviation occurred at archi. The published altitude at archi was 7;000 feet on the chart; which we made.we were told by norcal approach that the altitude over archi had been changed to 8;000 feet as indicated in a new fdc NOTAM. The aircraft after us were given formal instructions to cross archi at 8;000 feet. The other pilot and I both immediately recognized our mistake. Upon landing we were given a phone number. I called and discussed the deviation with the approach control supervisor. I explained to her apologetically that we had seen the new NOTAM for the restriction at archi; but had since forgotten about it due to our high workload and fatigue level due to another late night and six hour flight across the country. The supervisor understood. She told me that this was a new NOTAM. She also said we did not create a conflict with any other aircraft in the air. Overall; the conversation was positive.we could have drawn in the revised altitude at archi on our jeppesen chart after reviewing the NOTAM. That way we would not have forgotten. Also; ATC was issuing archi at 8;000 feet to the pilots on the arrival after us. If this is such a new NOTAM; and the incorrect altitude is published on the jeppesen chart; maybe ATC could be more pro-active at issuing 8;000 feet over archi to every pilot on the arrival.

Google
 

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: FDC NOTAM was not noticed by aircrew for a change in published altitude on arrival SFO. This is a common repeat item.

Narrative: We [worked] another late night and flight across the country. During our pre-flight planning; we checked all pertinent information of the flight; including all NOTAMs at SFO.We were told to descend via the DYAMD2 arrival into SFO. They were a little late issuing this instruction; which caused a steeper than normal descent. We notified them it would be hard to cross LAANE at FL260. ATC waved the restriction at LAANE and told us to make the crossing restriction at FLOWZ. The rest of the arrival was very busy; as we were being vectored quite a bit. The deviation occurred at ARCHI. The published altitude at ARCHI was 7;000 feet on the chart; which we made.We were told by NORCAL approach that the altitude over ARCHI had been changed to 8;000 feet as indicated in a new FDC NOTAM. The aircraft after us were given formal instructions to cross ARCHI at 8;000 feet. The other pilot and I both immediately recognized our mistake. Upon landing we were given a phone number. I called and discussed the deviation with the approach control supervisor. I explained to her apologetically that we had seen the new NOTAM for the restriction at ARCHI; but had since forgotten about it due to our high workload and fatigue level due to another late night and six hour flight across the country. The supervisor understood. She told me that this was a new NOTAM. She also said we did not create a conflict with any other aircraft in the air. Overall; the conversation was positive.We could have drawn in the revised altitude at ARCHI on our Jeppesen chart after reviewing the NOTAM. That way we would not have forgotten. Also; ATC was issuing ARCHI at 8;000 feet to the pilots on the arrival after us. If this is such a new NOTAM; and the incorrect altitude is published on the Jeppesen chart; maybe ATC could be more pro-active at issuing 8;000 feet over ARCHI to every pilot on the arrival.

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.