37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 1328768 |
Time | |
Date | 201602 |
Local Time Of Day | 0001-0600 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | SEA.Airport |
State Reference | WA |
Aircraft 1 | |
Make Model Name | Q400 |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 121 |
Flight Phase | Final Approach Landing |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Aircraft 2 | |
Make Model Name | Any Unknown or Unlisted Aircraft Manufacturer |
Flight Phase | Taxi |
Person 1 | |
Function | Pilot Not Flying Captain |
Qualification | Flight Crew Air Transport Pilot (ATP) |
Events | |
Anomaly | ATC Issue All Types Conflict Ground Conflict Less Severe |
Narrative:
Inbound; initially expecting runway 16R; then switched to 16L for a visual approach due to traffic on approach to 16R. Switched to tower; then cleared to land 16L. Just prior to landing 16L; heard tower controller give [another] flight that had just landed 16R a clearance to cross 16C and 16L. Since we were about to land 16L; I made a quick call to the tower that we were on short final to 16L. The controller immediately had [the other aircraft] hold short 16L; which they did. We landed uneventfully.I could see the [other] flight on the taxiway approaching 16C when the clearance to cross 16L was given. Based on the timing; had [the other aircraft] continued to cross 16L as cleared; we likely would have arrived at that intersection on the runway at the same time. Luckily for all of us; we were paying attention and heard the clearance given to [the other aircraft] to cross the runway we were about to land on and were able to avoid a runway incursion.the controller stated after landing that we were the first to land 16L in a while. Due to the complexity of sea and that the vast majority of flights land 16R; anytime there is a runway change can create an expectation bias or loss of situational awareness among the controllers and/or pilots. Obviously mistakes have and will be made with runway changes; so it's important that we pay attention to what's happening around us. In this case; a clearance that was not for us had a direct impact on our flight.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: Q400 Captain reported he was on short final to SEA Runway 16L when he heard Tower clear another aircraft to cross the runway. Tower cancelled that clearance after a heads-up from the reporter.
Narrative: Inbound; initially expecting runway 16R; then switched to 16L for a visual approach due to traffic on approach to 16R. Switched to tower; then cleared to land 16L. Just prior to landing 16L; heard tower controller give [another] flight that had just landed 16R a clearance to cross 16C and 16L. Since we were about to land 16L; I made a quick call to the tower that we were on short final to 16L. The controller immediately had [the other aircraft] hold short 16L; which they did. We landed uneventfully.I could see the [other] flight on the taxiway approaching 16C when the clearance to cross 16L was given. Based on the timing; had [the other aircraft] continued to cross 16L as cleared; we likely would have arrived at that intersection on the runway at the same time. Luckily for all of us; we were paying attention and heard the clearance given to [the other aircraft] to cross the runway we were about to land on and were able to avoid a runway incursion.The controller stated after landing that we were the first to land 16L in a while. Due to the complexity of SEA and that the vast majority of flights land 16R; anytime there is a runway change can create an Expectation Bias or Loss of Situational Awareness among the controllers and/or pilots. Obviously mistakes have and will be made with runway changes; so it's important that we pay attention to what's happening around us. In this case; a clearance that was not for us had a direct impact on our flight.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.