37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 1330589 |
Time | |
Date | 201602 |
Local Time Of Day | 0601-1200 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | GRK.TRACON |
State Reference | TX |
Environment | |
Flight Conditions | VMC |
Light | Daylight |
Aircraft 1 | |
Make Model Name | Cessna 310/T310C |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 91 |
Flight Phase | Cruise |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Aircraft 2 | |
Make Model Name | Small Aircraft Low Wing 2 Eng Retractable Gear |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 91 |
Flight Phase | Cruise |
Person 1 | |
Function | Single Pilot Captain Pilot Flying |
Qualification | Flight Crew Commercial Flight Crew Instrument Flight Crew Multiengine |
Experience | Flight Crew Last 90 Days 30 Flight Crew Total 430 Flight Crew Type 50 |
Events | |
Anomaly | ATC Issue All Types Conflict NMAC |
Miss Distance | Horizontal 1500 Vertical 300 |
Narrative:
We were in cruise at 9000 feet on an IFR flight plan. We were talking to gray approach at the time. I recently had ads-B installed in my aircraft and I got a traffic target on my garmin 530W. It looked like it could be a conflict. I called gray approach and asked if they had target at my 12 o'clock. Took a little [time] to respond. My wife and I were both looking for the target. It got within 200 ft of our altitude and was pretty much head on. I was debating turning but I wanted to get a visual if I could to make a better decision. I was going 200 mph or so and the target was going like 240 knots according to my ipad so not much time to figure it out. I had my 530w traffic page set at 6 miles for this exact reason to catch them sooner. We got a visual on the target probably 1.5 miles out. They went under our right wing. We were south bound they were north bound. When they passed ads-B was alerting 300 ft separation but it had gotten to 200 ft.I complained to gray approach told them that was way closer than I liked. I am on an IFR flight plan for a reason; to get some more eyeballs looking out for me. The controller kinda blew it off and almost immediately handed me off to houston center. Even though I did not have to make an altitude change; I was aware of the situation and ready to do so because of ads-B traffic. Maybe the controllers were preoccupied or they were shorthanded or busy handing us off. Regardless; way too close for me and my family.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: C310 pilot reported an NMAC at 9;000 FT while on an IFR flight.
Narrative: We were in cruise at 9000 feet on an IFR flight plan. We were talking to Gray approach at the time. I recently had ADS-B installed in my aircraft and I got a traffic target on my Garmin 530W. It looked like it could be a conflict. I called Gray approach and asked if they had target at my 12 o'clock. Took a little [time] to respond. My wife and I were both looking for the target. It got within 200 ft of our altitude and was pretty much head on. I was debating turning but I wanted to get a visual if I could to make a better decision. I was going 200 mph or so and the target was going like 240 knots according to my iPad so not much time to figure it out. I had my 530w traffic page set at 6 miles for this exact reason to catch them sooner. We got a visual on the target probably 1.5 miles out. They went under our right wing. We were south bound they were north bound. When they passed ADS-B was alerting 300 ft separation but it had gotten to 200 ft.I complained to Gray approach told them that was way closer than I liked. I am on an IFR flight plan for a reason; to get some more eyeballs looking out for me. The controller kinda blew it off and almost immediately handed me off to Houston Center. Even though I did not have to make an altitude change; I was aware of the situation and ready to do so because of ADS-B traffic. Maybe the controllers were preoccupied or they were shorthanded or busy handing us off. Regardless; way too close for me and my family.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.