37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 1336489 |
Time | |
Date | 201602 |
Local Time Of Day | 1201-1800 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | ZZZ.Airport |
State Reference | US |
Aircraft 1 | |
Make Model Name | EMB ERJ 170/175 ER/LR |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 121 |
Flight Phase | Taxi |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Person 1 | |
Function | Captain Pilot Flying |
Qualification | Flight Crew Air Transport Pilot (ATP) |
Events | |
Anomaly | Deviation - Procedural Published Material / Policy Deviation - Procedural FAR |
Narrative:
After we blocked in; a ramp employee stopped into the flight deck requesting a copy of our cargo load report from the previous flight. He advised me that we had failed his audit of baggage being loaded below the cargo fire suppression line in the forward cargo compartment (as it was loaded in seattle). Apparently several bags were above the placarded limit in the forward cargo compartment. There were not that many bags present (42 standard bags approximately); and the seattle ramp crew informed us that all bags were below the line when we asked them prior to departure in seattle.a physical inspection of the cargo compartment in seattle by the captain or first officer could have prevented the improper load situation; but this was hampered by maintenance delays and other duties in seattle. I am disappointed that my first officer directly asked the ramper in seattle about the bags being below the line; and that he responded that all were below the line when apparently they were not. I don't believe that our ramp personnel share in our accountability with regard to aircraft restrictions and limitations.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: EMB-175 Captain is informed after gate arrival that bags had been loaded above the fire suppression line on their previous leg. The ground had been specifically asked by the First Officer prior to departure if the bags were loaded correctly.
Narrative: After we blocked in; a ramp employee stopped into the flight deck requesting a copy of our Cargo Load Report from the previous flight. He advised me that we had failed his audit of baggage being loaded below the cargo fire suppression line in the forward cargo compartment (as it was loaded in Seattle). Apparently several bags were above the placarded limit in the forward cargo compartment. There were not that many bags present (42 standard bags approximately); and the Seattle ramp crew informed us that all bags were below the line when we asked them prior to departure in Seattle.A physical inspection of the cargo compartment in Seattle by the Captain or FO could have prevented the improper load situation; but this was hampered by maintenance delays and other duties in Seattle. I am disappointed that my FO directly asked the ramper in Seattle about the bags being below the line; and that he responded that all were below the line when apparently they were not. I don't believe that our ramp personnel share in our accountability with regard to aircraft restrictions and limitations.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.