37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 1348560 |
Time | |
Date | 201604 |
Local Time Of Day | 1201-1800 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | SDL.Airport |
State Reference | AZ |
Environment | |
Flight Conditions | VMC |
Light | Daylight |
Aircraft 1 | |
Make Model Name | Embraer Phenom 300 |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 91 |
Flight Phase | Descent |
Route In Use | Vectors |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Aircraft 2 | |
Make Model Name | Cessna Aircraft Undifferentiated or Other Model |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 91 |
Flight Phase | Climb |
Person 1 | |
Function | Captain Pilot Not Flying |
Qualification | Flight Crew Air Transport Pilot (ATP) Flight Crew Multiengine |
Experience | Flight Crew Last 90 Days 90 Flight Crew Total 5050 Flight Crew Type 1300 |
Events | |
Anomaly | Conflict NMAC |
Miss Distance | Horizontal 100 Vertical 0 |
Narrative:
During descent into sdl; we were under the control of phoenix approach on vectors. We were given a heading of 040 and descent to 6;000. We were advised of a cessna flying VFR under the control of approach and that it was on a converging course. The plane was told to level at 5;500 feet. At this time the autopilot was on and I was looking at the TCAS and outside while the pilot flying was looking outside and monitoring the autopilot. The cessna did not level at 5;500 and continued to climb. TCAS promptly gave a traffic advisory followed by a resolution advisory which required us to descend from 6;000 feet and ended up at 5;200 when we were given a 'clear of conflict' advisory. In the process I told approach we were responding to an RA. After leveling at 5;200 I asked what altitude they would like us to maintain (as it was time to descend). We were then cleared direct to the field; maintain 5;000; and contact another approach frequency. We continued to destination without any other issues. The cessna was very close and I never saw the aircraft until it was within 100 feet horizontally at our altitude. I saw the aircraft when responding to the descend RA. Without TCAS we may have had a different outcome. The cessna blew the clearance; not the controller.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: Phenom 300 Captain experienced a TCAS RA and NMAC at 6000 feet during vectors for approach. A VFR Cessna climbing to 5500 feet with the same Controller had continued to climb resulting in evasive action and a NMAC.
Narrative: During descent into SDL; we were under the control of Phoenix approach on vectors. We were given a heading of 040 and descent to 6;000. We were advised of a Cessna flying VFR under the control of approach and that it was on a converging course. The plane was told to level at 5;500 feet. At this time the autopilot was on and I was looking at the TCAS and outside while the pilot flying was looking outside and monitoring the autopilot. The Cessna did not level at 5;500 and continued to climb. TCAS promptly gave a traffic advisory followed by a resolution advisory which required us to descend from 6;000 feet and ended up at 5;200 when we were given a 'clear of conflict' advisory. In the process I told approach we were responding to an RA. After leveling at 5;200 I asked what altitude they would like us to maintain (as it was time to descend). We were then cleared direct to the field; maintain 5;000; and contact another approach frequency. We continued to destination without any other issues. The Cessna was very close and I never saw the aircraft until it was within 100 feet horizontally at our altitude. I saw the aircraft when responding to the descend RA. Without TCAS we may have had a different outcome. The Cessna blew the clearance; not the controller.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.