37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 1358102 |
Time | |
Date | 201605 |
Local Time Of Day | 0601-1200 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | ZNY.ARTCC |
State Reference | NY |
Environment | |
Flight Conditions | VMC |
Light | Daylight |
Aircraft 1 | |
Make Model Name | Eclipse 500 |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 91 |
Flight Phase | Cruise |
Route In Use | Direct |
Flight Plan | VFR |
Component | |
Aircraft Component | Pitot-Static System |
Person 1 | |
Function | Single Pilot Pilot Flying |
Qualification | Flight Crew Instrument Flight Crew Multiengine Flight Crew Private |
Experience | Flight Crew Last 90 Days 50 Flight Crew Total 1600 Flight Crew Type 1100 |
Events | |
Anomaly | Aircraft Equipment Problem Less Severe Conflict Airborne Conflict |
Miss Distance | Horizontal 0 Vertical 500 |
Narrative:
While enroute at 17;500 feet; I was distracted by troubleshooting an airspeed disagree cas that resulted in loss of autopilot (and the need to hand fly raw data). I did set TCAS to unrestricted and checked periodically for targets in a 20 NM radius. However; I saw the conflicting target only when my TCAS issued a traffic advisory (it is not able to provide ras) for a target directly underneath me; at 500 feet. At that point; I could not see the target (below me); I could not easily ascend (I was at 17;500 feet without a clearance into class a); so I continued to hand fly my course and the target eventually descended. Contributing factors were the airspeed disagree (possibly due to a bad pitot tube). Next time; I will scan the TCAS information more frequently.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: EA50 pilot reported an airborne conflict 500 feet below his cruise altitude of 17;500 feet.
Narrative: While enroute at 17;500 feet; I was distracted by troubleshooting an airspeed disagree CAS that resulted in loss of autopilot (and the need to hand fly raw data). I did set TCAS to unrestricted and checked periodically for targets in a 20 NM radius. However; I saw the conflicting target only when my TCAS issued a traffic advisory (it is not able to provide RAs) for a target directly underneath me; at 500 feet. At that point; I could not see the target (below me); I could not easily ascend (I was at 17;500 feet without a clearance into Class A); so I continued to hand fly my course and the target eventually descended. Contributing factors were the airspeed disagree (possibly due to a bad pitot tube). Next time; I will scan the TCAS information more frequently.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.