Narrative:

While enroute at 17;500 feet; I was distracted by troubleshooting an airspeed disagree cas that resulted in loss of autopilot (and the need to hand fly raw data). I did set TCAS to unrestricted and checked periodically for targets in a 20 NM radius. However; I saw the conflicting target only when my TCAS issued a traffic advisory (it is not able to provide ras) for a target directly underneath me; at 500 feet. At that point; I could not see the target (below me); I could not easily ascend (I was at 17;500 feet without a clearance into class a); so I continued to hand fly my course and the target eventually descended. Contributing factors were the airspeed disagree (possibly due to a bad pitot tube). Next time; I will scan the TCAS information more frequently.

Google
 

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: EA50 pilot reported an airborne conflict 500 feet below his cruise altitude of 17;500 feet.

Narrative: While enroute at 17;500 feet; I was distracted by troubleshooting an airspeed disagree CAS that resulted in loss of autopilot (and the need to hand fly raw data). I did set TCAS to unrestricted and checked periodically for targets in a 20 NM radius. However; I saw the conflicting target only when my TCAS issued a traffic advisory (it is not able to provide RAs) for a target directly underneath me; at 500 feet. At that point; I could not see the target (below me); I could not easily ascend (I was at 17;500 feet without a clearance into Class A); so I continued to hand fly my course and the target eventually descended. Contributing factors were the airspeed disagree (possibly due to a bad pitot tube). Next time; I will scan the TCAS information more frequently.

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.