37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 1360235 |
Time | |
Date | 201605 |
Local Time Of Day | 1801-2400 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | ZZZ.Airport |
State Reference | US |
Environment | |
Flight Conditions | VMC |
Light | Daylight |
Aircraft 1 | |
Make Model Name | B737-700 |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 121 |
Flight Phase | Descent |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Person 1 | |
Function | Captain |
Qualification | Flight Crew Air Transport Pilot (ATP) |
Experience | Flight Crew Last 90 Days 225 Flight Crew Type 10000 |
Events | |
Anomaly | Deviation - Procedural Clearance Deviation - Procedural Published Material / Policy Deviation - Track / Heading All Types |
Narrative:
Prior to departure; we verified flight routing with flight plan. We were unable to verify with actual ATC clearance; because it was received on taxi out. This is the procedure at this specific international city. No problems with this; just unusual from our standard SOP. The route had just loaded; and we had just [arrived]; so we were familiar with the peculiarities of the day. There was a runway closure earlier in the day. Previous flights into and out of [the airport] were conducted with the specific runway closed. The expectation was that we would land on the same runway. The first officer; in the loading of the FMC; put the anticipated runway in before departure. That's not something that is usually done; but given the previous flights; and the weather and winds; it seemed reasonable to leave it in the FMC. Takeoff; enroute; all uneventful briefings were conducted early and verified for the planned runway. Got the ATIS; and the other runway had opened. We set the courses and the ILS frequencies for the new runway in use. Prior to beginning the descent; the pilot monitoring (pm) had to use the lavatory; and had called the flight attendants; to ensure proper cockpit access. The flight attendants (flight attendant) were not immediately available; as they were involved with the international forms for the passengers. When they called to relieve the pm; we were in the middle of the ATIS; and the runway change. We received the descent clearance when the pm was not in the cockpit. With the additional communication difficulty of the oxygen mask; and the pm calling to regain entry back at that time; I do not recall the controller giving us a descent clearance specific to a runway. I do know we were cleared to descend via the arrival; and he also increased our speed to maintain 310 knots until zzzzz. Descent was uneventful in LNAV/VNAV. We turned earlier than the controller anticipated; and he issued a heading to fly. At that point; we verified we were set for the correct runway. The ILS; crs; and minimums for runway xxr were set. The FMC had the wrong transition; which was overlooked in the planning phase of the approach; due to the expectation bias; and distractions at the moment the actual clearance was given; and the descent clearance that may not have been given specific to a runway. (I may have missed it I can't recall). There were no traffic conflicts; and I don't know what the lateral deviation was from the course. We may have been within limits of the rnp 1. Contributing to the error:*distraction; as mentioned in narrative. *Fatigue and possible burnout; last leg of a [multiple]-day trip*relatively short overnights of 12 hours the previous two nights*the first day very long; within 20 minutes of timing out with a fdp of 15 hours; getting to sleep [at a very early time]. *Approximately on duty 10 hours at the point of error that day as well.*pm new to airline and lack of line experience
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: B737-700 Captain reported a track deviation resulted after they got a late runway change and the FMC was not properly re-programmed.
Narrative: Prior to departure; we verified flight routing with flight plan. We were unable to verify with actual ATC clearance; because it was received on taxi out. This is the procedure at this specific international city. No problems with this; just unusual from our standard SOP. The route had just loaded; and we had just [arrived]; so we were familiar with the peculiarities of the day. There was a runway closure earlier in the day. Previous flights into and out of [the airport] were conducted with the specific runway closed. The expectation was that we would land on the same runway. The First Officer; in the loading of the FMC; put the anticipated runway in before departure. That's not something that is usually done; but given the previous flights; and the weather and winds; it seemed reasonable to leave it in the FMC. Takeoff; enroute; all uneventful briefings were conducted early and verified for the planned runway. Got the ATIS; and the other runway had opened. We set the courses and the ILS frequencies for the new runway in use. Prior to beginning the descent; the Pilot Monitoring (PM) had to use the lavatory; and had called the Flight Attendants; to ensure proper cockpit access. The Flight Attendants (FA) were not immediately available; as they were involved with the international forms for the Passengers. When they called to relieve the PM; we were in the middle of the ATIS; and the runway change. We received the descent clearance when the PM was not in the cockpit. With the additional communication difficulty of the oxygen mask; and the PM calling to regain entry back at that time; I do not recall the Controller giving us a descent clearance specific to a runway. I do know we were cleared to descend via the Arrival; and he also increased our speed to maintain 310 knots until ZZZZZ. Descent was uneventful in LNAV/VNAV. We turned earlier than the Controller anticipated; and he issued a heading to fly. At that point; we verified we were set for the correct runway. The ILS; CRS; and minimums for Runway XXR were set. The FMC had the wrong transition; which was overlooked in the planning phase of the approach; due to the expectation bias; and distractions at the moment the actual clearance was given; and the descent clearance that may not have been given specific to a runway. (I may have missed it I can't recall). There were no traffic conflicts; and I don't know what the lateral deviation was from the course. We may have been within limits of the RNP 1. Contributing to the error:*Distraction; as mentioned in narrative. *Fatigue and possible burnout; last leg of a [multiple]-day trip*Relatively short overnights of 12 hours the previous two nights*The first day very long; within 20 minutes of timing out with a FDP of 15 hours; getting to sleep [at a very early time]. *Approximately on duty 10 hours at the point of error that day as well.*PM new to airline and lack of line experience
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.