37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 1369660 |
Time | |
Date | 201607 |
Local Time Of Day | 0601-1200 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | SFO.Airport |
State Reference | CA |
Environment | |
Flight Conditions | VMC |
Light | Daylight |
Aircraft 1 | |
Make Model Name | B737-700 |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 121 |
Flight Phase | Final Approach |
Route In Use | Visual Approach |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Aircraft 2 | |
Make Model Name | Heavy Transport |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 121 |
Flight Phase | Taxi |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Person 1 | |
Function | First Officer Pilot Flying |
Qualification | Flight Crew Air Transport Pilot (ATP) |
Events | |
Anomaly | Inflight Event / Encounter Wake Vortex Encounter |
Narrative:
I was the pilot flying on a visual approach to 28L. It was a typical sfo approach where I was slightly in trail of a heavy landing on 28R. I was told by ATC to keep him in sight and maintain a speed of 180 knots until 5 miles out. ATIS winds were 280/7 with no reports of wind shear. I used the ILS as a backup and was on localizer and glide slope. At around 400 feet the left quartering headwind shifted to a right quartering headwind. During the shift I lost a few knots of airspeed and dipped slightly below glide path. I applied power to get back on speed and on path. As I began to flare and slowly pull the power to idle; it felt like we flew through the wake of the heavy that had landed just ahead of us on 28R. I believe the wake drifted towards our runway due to the wind shift to a right quartering headwind. We got the wind shear aural alert but I was already in the flare with power moving towards idle and because I felt that the alert was the result of wake turbulence rather than environmental wind shear I chose to continue to a landing rather than to initiate the wind shear escape maneuver. We landed without incident and taxied to the gate.I felt that I made a safe call to continue to a landing. However; in hindsight I should have paid more heed to the wind shift and anticipated the potential wake encounter or I should have remained slightly above the glide path all the way in.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: B737-700 First Officer reported encountering wake turbulence just before touchdown on SFO Runway 28L from a heavy that was landing ahead of them on Runway 28R.
Narrative: I was the pilot flying on a visual approach to 28L. It was a typical SFO approach where I was slightly in trail of a heavy landing on 28R. I was told by ATC to keep him in sight and maintain a speed of 180 knots until 5 miles out. ATIS winds were 280/7 with no reports of wind shear. I used the ILS as a backup and was on localizer and glide slope. At around 400 feet the left quartering headwind shifted to a right quartering headwind. During the shift I lost a few knots of airspeed and dipped slightly below glide path. I applied power to get back on speed and on path. As I began to flare and slowly pull the power to idle; it felt like we flew through the wake of the heavy that had landed just ahead of us on 28R. I believe the wake drifted towards our runway due to the wind shift to a right quartering headwind. We got the wind shear aural alert but I was already in the flare with power moving towards idle and because I felt that the alert was the result of wake turbulence rather than environmental wind shear I chose to continue to a landing rather than to initiate the wind shear escape maneuver. We landed without incident and taxied to the gate.I felt that I made a safe call to continue to a landing. However; in hindsight I should have paid more heed to the wind shift and anticipated the potential wake encounter or I should have remained slightly above the glide path all the way in.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.