Mkg tower controller/instructor reported of an instance where an aircraft landed on a NOTAM closed r...

Narrative:

Myself and developmental received a briefing for the local control position. We were informed of the current traffic situation and informed that the runway (6/24) and taxiway (a; G; H) closures were no longer pertinent as of the closure end times as posted on the system atlanta. Aircraft X was inbound southwest of the field and [the developmental] noticed the winds were more aligned with 24 so he then coordinated with radar for a left downwind entry for the visual approach runway 24 for aircraft X. The aircraft was switched to [the developmental] and cleared to land and landed without incident at which time the phone rang with the county personnel calling asking if an aircraft had landed runway 24 because it was closed. Also of note there were no obstructions or lights of any sort indicating that the runway was closed.the situation in my opinion happened due to incorrect posting of NOTAM information on our systems atlanta page.

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: MKG Tower Controller/Instructor reported of an instance where an aircraft landed on a NOTAM Closed runway. Reporter did not show the runway closed and was briefed that the runway/taxiway closures were not pertinent.

Narrative: Myself and developmental received a briefing for the Local Control position. We were informed of the current traffic situation and informed that the runway (6/24) and taxiway (A; G; H) closures were no longer pertinent as of the closure end times as posted on the System Atlanta. Aircraft X was inbound southwest of the field and [the developmental] noticed the winds were more aligned with 24 so he then coordinated with radar for a left downwind entry for the visual approach runway 24 for Aircraft X. The aircraft was switched to [the developmental] and cleared to land and landed without incident at which time the phone rang with the county personnel calling asking if an aircraft had landed runway 24 because it was closed. Also of note there were no obstructions or lights of any sort indicating that the runway was closed.The situation in my opinion happened due to incorrect posting of NOTAM information on our Systems Atlanta page.

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.

Attributes
ACN	1388782
Time
Date	201609
Local Time Of Day	1801-2400
Place
Locale Reference	MKG.Airport
State Reference	MI
Aircraft 1
Make Model Name	Challenger 300
Operating Under FAR Part	Part 135
Flight Phase	Landing
Route In Use	Visual Approach
Flight Plan	IFR
Person 1
Function	Instructor Local
Qualification	Air Traffic Control Fully Certified
Experience	Air Traffic Control Time Certified In Pos 1 (yrs) 6
Events
Anomaly	ATC Issue All Types Deviation - Procedural Clearance Deviation - Procedural Published Material / Policy Ground Incursion Runway

Mkg tower controller/instructor reported of an instance where an aircraft landed on a NOTAM closed runway. Reporter did not show the runway closed and was briefed that the runway/taxiway closures were not pertinent.