37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 1390177 |
Time | |
Date | 201609 |
Local Time Of Day | 1201-1800 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | P80.TRACON |
State Reference | OR |
Environment | |
Flight Conditions | VMC |
Light | Daylight |
Aircraft 1 | |
Make Model Name | Medium Large Transport |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 121 |
Flight Phase | Initial Approach |
Route In Use | STAR TMBRS2 |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Aircraft 2 | |
Make Model Name | Small Aircraft High Wing 1 Eng Fixed Gear |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 91 |
Flight Phase | Climb |
Flight Plan | VFR |
Person 1 | |
Function | Approach |
Qualification | Air Traffic Control Fully Certified |
Experience | Air Traffic Control Time Certified In Pos 1 (yrs) 1 |
Events | |
Anomaly | ATC Issue All Types Conflict Airborne Conflict |
Narrative:
Aircraft X was descending via the tmbrs arrival to pdx. He had been advised of aircraft over mulino (4s9). Aircraft Y was climbing up over the mulino airport. Traffic was exchanged with both aircraft. As aircraft X came closer to the area I advised him once more of the traffic. I also readvised aircraft Y of aircraft X descending for pdx. Aircraft Y advised aircraft X in sight and would maintain visual separation. I then advised aircraft X that the traffic had him in sight and would maintain visual separation. Aircraft X later responded that they were responding to a TCAS RA. They completed the maneuver and then descended without incident to pdx. The location of 4s9 so near to the RNAV arrival is a concern. Although the area is clear of the arrival it is near enough to cause TCAS to alarm. The other option is to remove aircraft from the arrival; causing increased workload to both the pilot and ATC. Perhaps moving the tmbrs arrival slightly west of its present course could mitigate this issue.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: P80 TRACON Controller reported an arriving aircraft responded to a TCAS RA for a VFR aircraft that had the arriving aircraft in sight and was maintaining visual separation.
Narrative: Aircraft X was descending via the TMBRS arrival to PDX. He had been advised of aircraft over Mulino (4S9). Aircraft Y was climbing up over the Mulino airport. Traffic was exchanged with both aircraft. As Aircraft X came closer to the area I advised him once more of the traffic. I also readvised Aircraft Y of Aircraft X descending for PDX. Aircraft Y advised Aircraft X in sight and would maintain visual separation. I then advised Aircraft X that the traffic had him in sight and would maintain visual separation. Aircraft X later responded that they were responding to a TCAS RA. They completed the maneuver and then descended without incident to PDX. The location of 4S9 so near to the RNAV arrival is a concern. Although the area is clear of the arrival it is near enough to cause TCAS to alarm. The other option is to remove aircraft from the arrival; causing increased workload to both the pilot and ATC. Perhaps moving the TMBRS arrival slightly west of its present course could mitigate this issue.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.