37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 1390596 |
Time | |
Date | 201609 |
Local Time Of Day | 1801-2400 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | ATL.Airport |
State Reference | GA |
Environment | |
Light | Night |
Aircraft 1 | |
Make Model Name | Large Transport Low Wing 2 Turbojet Eng |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 121 |
Flight Phase | Initial Climb |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Aircraft 2 | |
Make Model Name | A320 |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 121 |
Flight Phase | Climb |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Person 1 | |
Function | Pilot Not Flying Captain |
Qualification | Flight Crew Air Transport Pilot (ATP) |
Experience | Flight Crew Last 90 Days 183 |
Person 2 | |
Function | Pilot Flying First Officer |
Qualification | Flight Crew Air Transport Pilot (ATP) |
Experience | Flight Crew Last 90 Days 161 |
Events | |
Anomaly | Deviation - Procedural Clearance Deviation - Track / Heading All Types Inflight Event / Encounter Wake Vortex Encounter |
Narrative:
We had an LNAV departure out of atl in an older model aircraft; minimum takeoff spacing behind an A320. Shortly after gear retraction (about 200 AGL) we encountered moderate wake turbulence. First officer did a great job; but it took full aileron deflection which got my attention. About the time we got out of it; I thought; we were in it again. This time it also took a lot of control input the other way to counteract the wake. We had done a precautionary takeoff due to LLWS advisory so we were climbing rapidly; and about the time we were out of it; tower called; 'turn left to 070 immediately.' first officer started turning immediately and I selected 070 and heading sel. I looked at our LNAV track and we were about a needle width off course on the CDI. Tower switched us and did not have any other comment.there was no traffic behind us; but tower seemed compelled to use the absolute minimum legal separation for takeoffs. I could have taken my time getting on the runway and starting the roll to increase our separation. I should have made a call to tower as soon as I saw our turn was going to be delayed due to the wake turbulence recovery.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: Large twin engine air carrier flight crew reported a track deviation resulted when they were distracted by a wake turbulence encounter shortly after takeoff from ATL.
Narrative: We had an LNAV departure out of ATL in an older model aircraft; minimum takeoff spacing behind an A320. Shortly after gear retraction (about 200 AGL) we encountered moderate wake turbulence. FO did a great job; but it took full aileron deflection which got my attention. About the time we got out of it; I thought; we were in it again. This time it also took a lot of control input the other way to counteract the wake. We had done a precautionary takeoff due to LLWS advisory so we were climbing rapidly; and about the time we were out of it; Tower called; 'turn left to 070 immediately.' FO started turning immediately and I selected 070 and HDG SEL. I looked at our LNAV track and we were about a needle width off course on the CDI. Tower switched us and did not have any other comment.There was no traffic behind us; but Tower seemed compelled to use the absolute minimum legal separation for takeoffs. I could have taken my time getting on the runway and starting the roll to increase our separation. I should have made a call to Tower as soon as I saw our turn was going to be delayed due to the wake turbulence recovery.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.