37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 1405792 |
Time | |
Date | 201611 |
Local Time Of Day | 1201-1800 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | ZZZ.Airport |
State Reference | US |
Environment | |
Flight Conditions | VMC |
Light | Daylight |
Aircraft 1 | |
Make Model Name | B757 Undifferentiated or Other Model |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 121 |
Flight Phase | Parked |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Component | |
Aircraft Component | Indicating and Warning - Flight & Navigation Systems |
Person 1 | |
Function | Captain Pilot Not Flying |
Qualification | Flight Crew Air Transport Pilot (ATP) |
Experience | Flight Crew Type 7998 |
Events | |
Anomaly | Aircraft Equipment Problem Less Severe Deviation - Procedural Published Material / Policy |
Narrative:
Aircraft refused due to deferral of all local annunciator lights on IRU panel on overhead panel inop. After careful review of deferral and considering that the flight was an ETOPS flight it was deemed that the highest level of safety would be compromised. Operation without a functioning IRU panel appeared to be unsafe and especially incompatible with an overwater flight. Most notably; review of the QRH IRS fault irregular procedure requires the ability to be able to tell if a fault light is illuminated. It is understandable that just because an item is legally deferred; the aircraft may still not be safe to operate under all conditions. Furthermore; after being told by maintenance that a replacement IRU panel was not available and unsuccessful attempts were made to convince crew to take the aircraft with the inop IRU panel; a part suddenly became available and the repair was promptly made. Overall; trying to get the captain and crew to take this aircraft with an inop IRU panel is part of a consistent dangerous trend to persuade or coerce crews to fly aircraft that they are uncomfortable flying. The last several occasions that I have refused aircraft have resulted in overbearing calls from the operations manager or chief pilot which is tantamount to pilot pushing. Unwarranted and intimidating calls often result in unnecessary added stress on pilots who are already operating in a demanding environment.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: B757 Captain reported being pressured after refusing an aircraft that had all annunciator lights on the IRU panel inoperative. The aircraft was accepted after repairs were made.
Narrative: Aircraft refused due to deferral of all local annunciator lights on IRU panel on overhead panel inop. After careful review of deferral and considering that the flight was an ETOPS flight it was deemed that the highest level of safety would be compromised. Operation without a functioning IRU panel appeared to be unsafe and especially incompatible with an overwater flight. Most notably; review of the QRH IRS FAULT irregular procedure requires the ability to be able to tell if a fault light is illuminated. It is understandable that just because an item is legally deferred; the aircraft may still not be safe to operate under all conditions. Furthermore; after being told by maintenance that a replacement IRU panel was not available and unsuccessful attempts were made to convince crew to take the aircraft with the inop IRU panel; a part suddenly became available and the repair was promptly made. Overall; trying to get the captain and crew to take this aircraft with an inop IRU panel is part of a consistent dangerous trend to persuade or coerce crews to fly aircraft that they are uncomfortable flying. The last several occasions that I have refused aircraft have resulted in overbearing calls from the Operations Manager or chief pilot which is tantamount to pilot pushing. Unwarranted and intimidating calls often result in unnecessary added stress on pilots who are already operating in a demanding environment.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.