37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 1408209 |
Time | |
Date | 201612 |
Local Time Of Day | 0601-1200 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | PAO.Airport |
State Reference | CA |
Environment | |
Flight Conditions | Marginal |
Light | Daylight |
Aircraft 1 | |
Make Model Name | Cessna Single Piston Undifferentiated or Other Model |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 91 |
Flight Phase | Initial Approach |
Route In Use | Other GPS Runway 31 |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Component | |
Aircraft Component | Vertical Speed System |
Person 1 | |
Function | Single Pilot |
Qualification | Flight Crew Instrument Flight Crew Commercial |
Experience | Flight Crew Last 90 Days 14 Flight Crew Total 1260 Flight Crew Type 830 |
Events | |
Anomaly | Aircraft Equipment Problem Less Severe Deviation - Altitude Excursion From Assigned Altitude |
Narrative:
While on instrument approach GPS 31 to pao I started to receive unreliable indications of vertical speed from G1000 avionics; with vs varying momentarily to +/- 1000 ft/min. Since I was flying a coupled approach the autopilot started to correct. This resulted in the airplane descending below a segment altitude of 2000 ft. This in turn triggered [an] altitude alert from pao tower. I corrected by switching off the autopilot and flying by hand. I continued the approach and realized the indications of the G1000 were still unreliable. While in VMC and with airport and runway environment in sight I positioned the aircraft for circle to land approach and descended below circling altitude which was noted by the tower. I continued to successful landing using the standby altimeter only.in retrospect after the first indication of widely changing vertical speed from G1000 I should have continued flying using the standby instruments only. The G1000 is going to be reviewed by the authorized avionics shop. I want to stress that the event happened in VMC and I had visual contact with the ground at all times.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: Cessna pilot reported ATC advised him of several altitude deviations that resulted from anomalies within the G1000 vertical speed display.
Narrative: While on instrument approach GPS 31 to PAO I started to receive unreliable indications of vertical speed from G1000 avionics; with VS varying momentarily to +/- 1000 ft/min. Since I was flying a coupled approach the autopilot started to correct. This resulted in the airplane descending below a segment altitude of 2000 ft. This in turn triggered [an] altitude alert from PAO Tower. I corrected by switching off the autopilot and flying by hand. I continued the approach and realized the indications of the G1000 were still unreliable. While in VMC and with airport and runway environment in sight I positioned the aircraft for circle to land approach and descended below circling altitude which was noted by the tower. I continued to successful landing using the standby altimeter only.In retrospect after the first indication of widely changing vertical speed from G1000 I should have continued flying using the standby instruments only. The G1000 is going to be reviewed by the authorized avionics shop. I want to stress that the event happened in VMC and I had visual contact with the ground at all times.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.