37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 1410139 |
Time | |
Date | 201612 |
Local Time Of Day | 1201-1800 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | CJR.Airport |
State Reference | VA |
Environment | |
Flight Conditions | VMC |
Light | Daylight |
Aircraft 1 | |
Make Model Name | Small Aircraft Low Wing 1 Eng Fixed Gear |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 91 |
Flight Phase | Initial Approach |
Route In Use | Other RNAV Runway 22 |
Flight Plan | None |
Person 1 | |
Function | Instructor Pilot Not Flying |
Qualification | Flight Crew Air Transport Pilot (ATP) Flight Crew Multiengine Flight Crew Instrument Flight Crew Flight Instructor |
Experience | Flight Crew Last 90 Days 50 Flight Crew Total 10000 Flight Crew Type 3000 |
Events | |
Anomaly | Deviation - Procedural FAR Deviation - Procedural Published Material / Policy |
Narrative:
During a practice instrument approach (RNAV 22) at culpepper airport (cjr) in VFR conditions; I noted that the depicted course reversal at the doyat IAF at the published initial approach altitude (3000 ft MSL) would appear to result in an incursion into the class B airspace 2500 altitude floor if one complied with the 4 NM course reversal required by the published approach procedure. While the doyat intersection lies below the 4500 foot class B floor; the required course reversal appears to result in an incursion into the 2500 foot ring. Upon noting the upcoming incursion; I believe that I was able to avoid the incursion by flying a 3 mile course reversal pattern rather than the depicted 4 mile pattern but it was certainly close to the 2500 foot boundary. I recommend that the depicted course reversal leg be shortened or the approach procedure amended to require obtaining a class B clearance prior to executing this procedure to avoid a possible class B infraction. Most students are more focused on executing the published procedure than figuring out that the depicted procedure could result in a class B infraction. While I do not think that an incursion occurred; the resolution of the onboard avionics display cannot with absolute certainty guarantee this especially if the 4 mile reversal is flown.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: A general aviation instructor pilot reported noticing that the CJR RNAV 22 approach could; if flown as depicted; possibly intrude on the IAD Class B airspace. Reporter recommended an adjustment to the procedure turn to preclude a possible airspace violation.
Narrative: During a practice instrument approach (RNAV 22) at Culpepper Airport (CJR) in VFR conditions; I noted that the depicted course reversal at the DOYAT IAF at the published initial approach altitude (3000 ft MSL) would appear to result in an incursion into the class B airspace 2500 altitude floor if one complied with the 4 NM course reversal required by the published approach procedure. While the DOYAT intersection lies below the 4500 foot class B floor; the required course reversal appears to result in an incursion into the 2500 foot ring. Upon noting the upcoming incursion; I believe that I was able to avoid the incursion by flying a 3 mile course reversal pattern rather than the depicted 4 mile pattern but it was certainly close to the 2500 foot boundary. I recommend that the depicted course reversal leg be shortened or the approach procedure amended to require obtaining a class B clearance prior to executing this procedure to avoid a possible class B infraction. Most students are more focused on executing the published procedure than figuring out that the depicted procedure could result in a class B infraction. While I do not think that an incursion occurred; the resolution of the onboard avionics display cannot with absolute certainty guarantee this especially if the 4 mile reversal is flown.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.