37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 1418691 |
Time | |
Date | 201701 |
Local Time Of Day | 1201-1800 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | HPN.Airport |
State Reference | NY |
Environment | |
Flight Conditions | VMC |
Light | Daylight |
Aircraft 1 | |
Make Model Name | Light Transport Low Wing 2 Turbojet Eng |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 91 |
Flight Phase | Taxi |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Aircraft 2 | |
Make Model Name | Gulfstream Jet Undifferentiated or Other Model |
Flight Phase | Landing |
Person 1 | |
Function | Pilot Flying Captain |
Qualification | Flight Crew Air Transport Pilot (ATP) |
Events | |
Anomaly | ATC Issue All Types Conflict Ground Conflict Critical |
Narrative:
Hpn airport; holding short of runway 34; awaiting takeoff clearance; the crew observed the following. A gulfstream was cleared to land runway 34. The gulfstream was in the landing flare at approximately 40 feet when tower issued 'go around; go around' to the gulfstream. We were watching it land when the command was issued. The gulfstream pitched up and executed a go around as a small cessna landing runway 29 passed directly under the gulfstream on the landing rollout. I estimate 50 feet separation; at most. We observed this from about 150 yards away. This was about as close as it gets without an explosion. The gulfstream returned for a landing and ask 'why the go-around'. Tower replied; cessna landed without landing clearance. Nothing else was said between tower and the gulfstream. I believe tower/ATC/approach made a near fatal error in not recognizing the proximity of the cessna to the cleared to land gulfstream. After the event; operations resumed normally with business jets/airliners landing 34 and small aircraft landing one after another runway 29. I believe during these type of operations a high level of vigilance should exist between only highly experienced tower/ATC controllers. I have seen similar incidents happen at hpn. Tower controller seemingly [had] 'lack of experience' or [experienced] 'loss of situational awareness.'
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: Corporate jet Captain reported observing a near-collision between a Gulfstream landing on HPN Runway 34 and a Cessna landing on Runway 29. Reporter was of the opinion it was an ATC error.
Narrative: HPN airport; holding short of Runway 34; awaiting takeoff clearance; the crew observed the following. A Gulfstream was cleared to land runway 34. The Gulfstream was in the landing flare at approximately 40 feet when tower issued 'go around; go around' to the Gulfstream. We were watching it land when the command was issued. The Gulfstream pitched up and executed a go around as a small Cessna landing runway 29 passed directly under the Gulfstream on the landing rollout. I estimate 50 feet separation; at most. We observed this from about 150 yards away. This was about as close as it gets without an explosion. The Gulfstream returned for a landing and ask 'why the go-around'. Tower replied; Cessna landed without landing clearance. Nothing else was said between Tower and the Gulfstream. I believe Tower/ATC/Approach made a near fatal error in not recognizing the proximity of the Cessna to the cleared to land Gulfstream. After the event; operations resumed normally with business jets/airliners landing 34 and small aircraft landing one after another Runway 29. I believe during these type of operations a high level of vigilance should exist between only highly experienced Tower/ATC Controllers. I have seen similar incidents happen at HPN. Tower controller seemingly [had] 'lack of experience' or [experienced] 'loss of situational awareness.'
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.