37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 1420973 |
Time | |
Date | 201701 |
Local Time Of Day | 1801-2400 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | HPN.Airport |
State Reference | NY |
Environment | |
Flight Conditions | VMC |
Light | Night |
Aircraft 1 | |
Make Model Name | Small Aircraft Low Wing 1 Eng Fixed Gear |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 91 |
Flight Phase | Landing |
Route In Use | None |
Flight Plan | None |
Person 1 | |
Function | Pilot Flying Single Pilot |
Qualification | Flight Crew Instrument Flight Crew Private |
Experience | Flight Crew Last 90 Days 18 Flight Crew Total 511 Flight Crew Type 5 |
Events | |
Anomaly | ATC Issue All Types Inflight Event / Encounter Object Inflight Event / Encounter CFTT / CFIT |
Narrative:
I was conducting stop-and-go practice at night at white plains (khpn) airport for the purpose of gaining night currency. Winds were 290; approximately 10g20. ATIS mentioned landing runways as runway 34 and runway 29. I chose runway 29 as it was more aligned with the wind. I took off runway 29 and flew a left traffic pattern. I was cleared to land on runway 29. On final; I found myself lower than needed and I clipped the top of a tree. I subsequently conducted an immediate go-around; [advised the] tower; and landed the airplane normally on runway 34. I was alone in the airplane. There was no bodily harm of anyone; nor was there property damaged on the ground. The airplane was damaged. The likely cause of the problem in my opinion is that it is extremely difficult to conduct a normal approach to runway 29 at night; as there is no VASI light; and the threshold is displaced by a very large distance in order to account for tall trees that border the airfield. Before taking off; I looked for an approach to runway 29 in order to get an approach profile as a backup; but found there was no such approach (very likely due to the nonstandard configuration of obstacles close to the runway end.) in my opinion; runway 29 should be closed at night for landing.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: A general aviation pilot reported clipping a tree on final approach to HPN Runway 29. Darkness and the lack of a VASI were reported as contributing factors.
Narrative: I was conducting stop-and-go practice at night at White Plains (KHPN) airport for the purpose of gaining night currency. Winds were 290; approximately 10G20. ATIS mentioned landing runways as Runway 34 and Runway 29. I chose runway 29 as it was more aligned with the wind. I took off Runway 29 and flew a left traffic pattern. I was cleared to land on Runway 29. On final; I found myself lower than needed and I clipped the top of a tree. I subsequently conducted an immediate go-around; [advised the] Tower; and landed the airplane normally on Runway 34. I was alone in the airplane. There was no bodily harm of anyone; nor was there property damaged on the ground. The airplane was damaged. The likely cause of the problem in my opinion is that it is extremely difficult to conduct a normal approach to Runway 29 at night; as there is no VASI light; and the threshold is displaced by a very large distance in order to account for tall trees that border the airfield. Before taking off; I looked for an approach to Runway 29 in order to get an approach profile as a backup; but found there was no such approach (very likely due to the nonstandard configuration of obstacles close to the runway end.) In my opinion; Runway 29 should be closed at night for landing.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.