Md-80 flight crew reported returning to the departure airport after receiving a tail compartment ove...

Narrative:

[After departure] tail compartment overheat light illuminated passing FL250; while I was giving the PA concerning seatbelt protocol; arrival time; and destination weather. It was the first officer's leg. He accomplished the memory items and light extinguished. We [advised ATC] and requested clearance to return to [departure airport] for a visual approach. First officer has 10;000 hours in the md-80; had him continue to fly and talk to ATC while I completed the QRH procedures; briefed the flight attendants; coordinated with dispatch; and obtained a landing data performance assessment for an overweight landing. Started the before landing checklist passing 16;000 feet and asked the first officer what he had for the current altimeter setting thinking he had obtained one from ATC. However; he inadvertently gave the setting from the ACARS ATIS print out for [destination] that had already been put on the center pedestal. The erroneous setting resulted in a subsequent momentary deviation from an assigned ATC altitude. ATC advised they showed us below our assigned altitude of 3000 feet and told us check our altimeter setting. We were at 2600 feet with the correct altimeter setting; and immediately corrected back to 3000 feet. Coordinated for single frequency approach and crf to thermal scan aircraft after landing. First officer executed excellent approach and landing. Continued to the gate after crash fire rescue equipment inspection. Entered overweight landing entry and tail comp overheat discrepancy in the aml. Contributing factors to this event include human error regarding the source of the correct altimeter setting. I thought the first officer had obtained the correct altimeter setting from ATC while I was accomplishing other tasks. The first officer thought he had the correct altimeter setting from the ACARS ATIS print out.I would avoid this event by not allowing the non-normal events of an inflight anomaly detract from normal procedures. I would get another current ACARS ATIS print out; and ensure receipt of the ATIS information was coordinated with ATC; like I do on every flight.

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: MD-80 flight crew reported returning to the departure airport after receiving a tail compartment overheat light. They mistakenly descended below their assigned altitude due to using the destination altimeter setting.

Narrative: [After departure] Tail Compartment Overheat Light illuminated passing FL250; while I was giving the PA concerning seatbelt protocol; arrival time; and destination weather. It was the FO's leg. He accomplished the memory items and light extinguished. We [advised ATC] and requested clearance to return to [departure airport] for a visual approach. First Officer has 10;000 Hours in the MD-80; had him continue to fly and talk to ATC while I completed the QRH procedures; briefed the Flight Attendants; coordinated with Dispatch; and obtained a Landing Data Performance Assessment for an Overweight Landing. Started the Before Landing Checklist passing 16;000 feet and asked the FO what he had for the current altimeter setting thinking he had obtained one from ATC. However; he inadvertently gave the setting from the ACARS ATIS print out for [destination] that had already been put on the center pedestal. The erroneous setting resulted in a subsequent momentary deviation from an assigned ATC altitude. ATC advised they showed us below our assigned altitude of 3000 feet and told us check our altimeter setting. We were at 2600 feet with the correct altimeter setting; and immediately corrected back to 3000 feet. Coordinated for Single Frequency Approach and CRF to thermal scan aircraft after landing. FO executed excellent approach and landing. Continued to the gate after CFR inspection. Entered Overweight Landing entry and Tail Comp Overheat discrepancy in the AML. Contributing factors to this event include human error regarding the source of the correct altimeter setting. I thought the FO had obtained the correct altimeter setting from ATC while I was accomplishing other tasks. The FO thought he had the correct altimeter setting from the ACARS ATIS print out.I would avoid this event by not allowing the non-normal events of an inflight anomaly detract from normal procedures. I would get another current ACARS ATIS print out; and ensure receipt of the ATIS information was coordinated with ATC; like I do on every flight.

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.

Attributes
ACN	1434373
Time
Date	201703
Local Time Of Day	1201-1800
Place
Locale Reference	ZZZ.Airport
State Reference	US
Environment
Flight Conditions	VMC
Light	Daylight
Aircraft 1
Make Model Name	MD-80 Series (DC-9-80) Undifferentiated or Other Model
Operating Under FAR Part	Part 121
Flight Phase	Initial Approach
Flight Plan	IFR
Component
Aircraft Component	Pneumatic Ducting
Person 1
Function	Captain Pilot Not Flying
Qualification	Flight Crew Air Transport Pilot (ATP)
Experience	Flight Crew Total 22000
Person 2
Function	Pilot Flying First Officer
Qualification	Flight Crew Air Transport Pilot (ATP)
Experience	Flight Crew Total 15000
Events
Anomaly	Aircraft Equipment Problem Less Severe Deviation - Altitude Overshoot Deviation - Procedural Clearance Flight Deck / Cabin / Aircraft Event Other / Unknown

Md-80 flight crew reported returning to the departure airport after receiving a tail compartment overheat light. They mistakenly descended below their assigned altitude due to using the destination altimeter setting.